The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment

被引:163
作者
Forster, Jens [1 ]
Liberman, Nira [2 ]
Kuschel, Stefanie [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Social Psychol, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Jacobs Univ Bremen, Bremen, Germany
关键词
assimilation and contrast; exclusion versus inclusion; processing styles;
D O I
10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.579
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The authors propose a global/local processing style model (GLOMO) for assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment. GLOMO is based on Schwarz and Bless' (1992, 2007) inclusion-exclusion model, which suggests that when information is included into a category, assimilation occurs, whereas when information is excluded from a category, contrast occurs. According to GLOMO, inclusion versus exclusion should be influenced by whether people process information globally or locally. In 5 experiments, using both disambiguation and social comparison, the authors induced local versus global processing through perceptual tasks and time perspective and showed that global processing produced assimilation, whereas local processing produced contrast. The experiments showed that processing styles elicited in one task can carry over to other tasks and influence social judgments. Furthermore, they found that hemisphere activation and accessibility of judgment-consistent knowledge partially mediated these effects. Implications for current and classic models of social judgment are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 599
页数:21
相关论文
共 112 条
[21]  
DeSteno D., 1997, Review of General Psychology, V1, P389, DOI [DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.1.4.389, 10.1037/1089-2680.1.4.389]
[22]   Seeing one thing and doing another: Contrast effects in automatic behavior [J].
Dijksterhuis, A ;
Spears, R ;
Postmes, T ;
Stapel, DA ;
Koomen, W ;
van Knippenberg, A ;
Scheepers, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 75 (04) :862-871
[23]   The verbal overshadowing effect: Why descriptions impair face recognition [J].
Dodson, CS ;
Johnson, MK ;
Schooler, JW .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1997, 25 (02) :129-139
[24]   IRRATIONAL REACTIONS TO NEGATIVE OUTCOMES - EVIDENCE FOR 2 CONCEPTUAL SYSTEMS [J].
EPSTEIN, S ;
LIPSON, A ;
HOLSTEIN, C ;
HUH, E .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 62 (02) :328-339
[25]   Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? [J].
Fink, GR ;
Halligan, PW ;
Marshall, JC ;
Frith, CD ;
Frackowiak, RSJ ;
Dolan, RJ .
NATURE, 1996, 382 (6592) :626-628
[26]   THEORIES RELATING MENTAL-IMAGERY TO PERCEPTION [J].
FINKE, RA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1985, 98 (02) :236-259
[27]  
Fiore SM, 1998, RIGHT HEMISPHERE LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION, P349
[28]  
FISHBACH A, 2006, UNPUB BROADENING NAR
[29]   Enactment of approach and avoidance behavior influences the scope of perceptual and conceptual attention [J].
Förster, J ;
Friedman, RS ;
Özelsel, A ;
Denzler, M .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 42 (02) :133-146
[30]   Motor actions in retrieval of valenced information: A motor congruence effect [J].
Forster, J ;
Strack, F .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1997, 85 (03) :1419-1427