The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment

被引:163
作者
Forster, Jens [1 ]
Liberman, Nira [2 ]
Kuschel, Stefanie [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Social Psychol, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Jacobs Univ Bremen, Bremen, Germany
关键词
assimilation and contrast; exclusion versus inclusion; processing styles;
D O I
10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.579
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The authors propose a global/local processing style model (GLOMO) for assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment. GLOMO is based on Schwarz and Bless' (1992, 2007) inclusion-exclusion model, which suggests that when information is included into a category, assimilation occurs, whereas when information is excluded from a category, contrast occurs. According to GLOMO, inclusion versus exclusion should be influenced by whether people process information globally or locally. In 5 experiments, using both disambiguation and social comparison, the authors induced local versus global processing through perceptual tasks and time perspective and showed that global processing produced assimilation, whereas local processing produced contrast. The experiments showed that processing styles elicited in one task can carry over to other tasks and influence social judgments. Furthermore, they found that hemisphere activation and accessibility of judgment-consistent knowledge partially mediated these effects. Implications for current and classic models of social judgment are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 599
页数:21
相关论文
共 112 条
[81]   'Seek and ye shall find': antecedents of assimilation and contrast in social comparison [J].
Mussweiler, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 31 (05) :499-509
[82]   The "relative self": Informational and judgmental consequences of comparative self-evaluation [J].
Mussweiler, T ;
Strack, F .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 79 (01) :23-38
[83]   FOREST BEFORE TREES - PRECEDENCE OF GLOBAL FEATURES IN VISUAL-PERCEPTION [J].
NAVON, D .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 9 (03) :353-383
[84]   Approach and avoidance: The influence of proprioceptive and exteroceptive cues on encoding of affective information [J].
Neumann, R ;
Strack, F .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 79 (01) :39-48
[85]   CATEGORY JUDGMENT - A RANGE-FREQUENCY MODEL [J].
PARDUCCI, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1965, 72 (06) :407-418
[86]   ASSIMILATION AND CONTRAST AS RANGE-FREQUENCY EFFECTS OF ANCHORS [J].
PARDUCCI, A ;
PERRETT, DS ;
MARSH, HW .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 81 (02) :281-&
[87]   The future of optimism [J].
Peterson, C .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2000, 55 (01) :44-55
[88]   The influence of motor processes on attitudes toward novel versus familiar semantic stimuli [J].
Priester, JR ;
Cacioppo, JT ;
Petty, RE .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1996, 22 (05) :442-447
[89]   Verbalization produces a transfer inappropriate processing shift [J].
Schooler, JW .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 16 (08) :989-997
[90]  
SCHWARZ N, 1992, CONSTRUCTION OF SOCIAL JUDGMENTS, P217