Application of refocused steady-state free-precession methods at 1.5 and 3 T to in vivo high-resolution MRI of trabecular bone: Simulations and experiments

被引:40
作者
Banerjee, S
Han, ET
Krug, R
Newitt, DC
Majumdar, S
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94107 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Joint Grad Grp Bioengn, San Francisco, CA 94107 USA
[3] GE Healthcare, ASL W, Menlo Pk, CA USA
关键词
SSFP; SNR; high-resolution; trabecular micro-architecture; susceptibility;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.20348
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the potential of fully-balanced steady-state free-precession (SSFP) sequences in in vivo high-resolution (HR) MRI of trabecular bone at field strengths of 1.5 and 3 T by simulation and experimental methods. Materials and Methods: Using simulation studies, refocused SSFP acquisition was optimized for our imaging purposes with a focus on signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and SNR efficiency. The signal behavior in trabecular bone was estimated using a magnetostatic model of the trabecular bone and marrow. Eight normal volunteers were imaged at the proximal femur, calcaneus, and the distal tibia on a GE Signa scanner at 1.5 and at 3 T with an optimized single-acquisition SSFP sequence (three-dimensional FIESTA) and an optimized multiple-acquisition SSFP sequence (three-dimensional FIESTA-c). Images were also acquired with a fast gradient echo (FGRE) sequence for evaluation of the SNR performance of SSFP methods. Results: Refocused SSFP images outperformed FGRE acquisitions in both SNR and SNR efficiency at both field strengths. At 3 T, susceptibility effects were visible in FIESTA and FGRE images and much reduced in FIESTA-c images. The magnitude of SNR boost at 3 T was closely predicted by simulations. Conclusion: Single-acquisition SSFP (at 1.5 T) and multiple-acquisition SSFP (at 3 T) hold great potential for HR-MRI of trabecular bone. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:818 / 825
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]   Fast 3D large-angle spin-echo imaging (3D FLASE) [J].
Ma, JF ;
Wehrli, FW ;
Song, HK .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1996, 35 (06) :903-910
[12]   Trabecular bone architecture in the distal radius using magnetic resonance imaging in subjects with fractures of the proximal femur [J].
Majumdar, S ;
Link, TM ;
Augat, P ;
Lin, JC ;
Newitt, D ;
Lane, NE ;
Genant, HK .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 10 (03) :231-239
[13]   High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: Three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties [J].
Majumdar, S ;
Kothari, M ;
Augat, P ;
Newitt, DC ;
Link, TM ;
Lin, JC ;
Lang, T ;
Lu, Y ;
Genant, HK .
BONE, 1998, 22 (05) :445-454
[14]   QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF THE SUSCEPTIBILITY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TRABECULAR BONE AND BONE-MARROW - COMPUTER-SIMULATIONS [J].
MAJUMDAR, S .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1991, 22 (01) :101-110
[15]  
Majumdar Sharmila, 2002, Top Magn Reson Imaging, V13, P323, DOI 10.1097/00002142-200210000-00004
[16]   Processing and analysis of in vivo high-resolution MR images of trabecular bone for longitudinal studies: Reproducibility of structural measures and micro-finite element analysis derived mechanical properties [J].
Newitt, DC ;
van Rietbergen, B ;
Majumdar, S .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 13 (04) :278-287
[17]   Signal-to-noise ratio behavior of steady-state free precession [J].
Reeder, SB ;
Herzka, DA ;
McVeigh, ER .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2004, 52 (01) :123-130
[18]   Is TrueFISP a gradient-echo or a spin-echo sequence? [J].
Scheffler, K ;
Hennig, J .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 49 (02) :395-397
[19]  
TECHAWIBOONWONG A, 2004, P 12 ANN M ISMRM KYO
[20]  
Vasanawala SS, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V42, P876, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199911)42:5<876::AID-MRM6>3.0.CO