Diagnostic yield of conventional and digital cephalometric images: a human cadaver study

被引:17
作者
Gijbels, F [1 ]
Serhal, CB [1 ]
Willems, G [1 ]
Bosmans, H [1 ]
Sanderink, G [1 ]
Persoons, M [1 ]
Jacobs, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Sch Dent Oral Pathol & Maxillofacial Surg, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
digital radiography; dental; radiography; radiation dosage; cephalometry;
D O I
10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600585
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the clinical efficacy of digital and conventional cephalometric imaging. Methods: Conventional and photostimulable phosphor cephalometric radiographs were obtained from three human cadavers at nine different exposure settings. Subjective image quality was assessed by six observers who evaluated six cephalometric landmarks. Organ doses were measured with TLDs and effective doses calculated. Results: Compared with conventional cephalometric images, digital images had a consistently better subjective image quality for all exposure settings which was significant (P<0.05) for all but two. Organ doses were comparable. Higher kV and lower mAs settings yielded the lowest effective dose, which was highly dependent on the position of the thyroid gland in the beam. Conclusion: Relatively small variations in exposure settings do not influence subjective diagnostic image quality of digital cephalometric radiographs. Higher kV and lower mAs settings have the lowest effective dose and should therefore be preferred.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 105
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   RADIATION-ABSORBED DOSES AND ENERGY IMPARTED FROM PANORAMIC TOMOGRAPHY, CEPHALOMETRIC RADIOGRAPHY, AND OCCLUSAL FILM RADIOGRAPHY IN CHILDREN [J].
BANKVALL, G ;
HAKANSSON, HAR .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1982, 53 (05) :532-540
[2]   DIGITAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHY WITH PHOTOSTIMULABLE STORAGE PHOSPHORS - SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO AS A FUNCTION OF KILOVOLTAGE WITH MATCHED EXPOSURE RISK [J].
CHOTAS, HG ;
FLOYD, CE ;
DOBBINS, JT ;
RAVIN, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 186 (02) :395-398
[3]  
ELIASSON S, 1985, SWED DENT J, V9, P117
[4]   THE EFFICACY OF DIAGNOSTIC-IMAGING [J].
FRYBACK, DG ;
THORNBURY, JR .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1991, 11 (02) :88-94
[5]   DOSIMETRY OF ABSORBED RADIATION IN RADIOGRAPHIC CEPHALOMETRY [J].
GILDA, JE ;
MAILLIE, HD .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1992, 73 (05) :638-643
[6]   REVIEW ARTICLE - RADIATION PROTECTION IN DENTAL RADIOLOGY [J].
HORNER, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1994, 67 (803) :1041-1049
[7]   Environmental factors and the risk of salivary gland cancer [J].
HornRoss, PL ;
Ljung, BM ;
Morrow, M .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 8 (04) :414-419
[8]  
LANGLAND OE, 1997, PRINCPLES DENT IMAGI, P279
[9]   Optimisation of patient doses in programmable dental panoramic radiography [J].
Lecomber, AR ;
Downes, SL ;
Mokhtari, M ;
Faulkner, K .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 29 (02) :107-112
[10]  
Macri V, 1993, Eur J Orthod, V15, P137