Water quality monitoring strategies - A review and future perspectives

被引:275
作者
Behmel, S. [1 ]
Damour, M. [2 ]
Ludwig, R. [3 ]
Rodriguez, M. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Ecole Super Amenagement Terr & Dev Reg, Pavillon Felix Antoine Savard,Bur 1628, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[2] DATALEA, 74 Ave Tivoli,Batiment C, F-33110 Le Bouscat, France
[3] Univ Munich, Lehrstuhl Geog & Geog Fernerkundung, Luisenstr 37, D-80333 Munich, Germany
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Water quality monitoring programs; Intelligent decision support system; Participative approaches; NETWORK DESIGN METHODOLOGY; CRITICAL SAMPLING POINTS; LARGE RIVER; FRAMEWORK; IMPLEMENTATION; INFORMATION; LAKES; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.235
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The reliable assessment of water quality through water quality monitoring programs (WQMPs) is crucial in order for decision-makers to understand, interpret and use this information in support of their management activities aiming at protecting the resource. The challenge of water quality monitoring has been widely addressed in the literature since the 1940s. However, there is still no generally accepted, holistic and practical strategy to support all phases of WQMPs. The purpose of this paper is to report on the use cases a watershed manager has to address to plan or optimize a WQMP from the challenge of identifying monitoring objectives; selecting sampling sites and water quality parameters; identifying sampling frequencies; considering logistics and resources to the implementation of actions based on information acquired through the WQMP. An inventory and critique of the information, approaches and tools placed at the disposal of watershed managers was proposed to evaluate how the existing information could be integrated in a holistic, user-friendly and evolvable solution. Given the differences in regulatory requirements, water quality standards, geographical and geological differences, land-use variations, and other site specificities, a one-in-all solution is not possible. However, we advance that an intelligent decision support system (IDSS) based on expert knowledge that integrates existing approaches and past research can guide a watershed manager through the process according to his/her site-specific requirements. It is also necessary to tap into local knowledge and to identify the knowledge needs of all the stakeholders through participative approaches based on geographical information systems and adaptive survey-based questionnaires. We believe that future research should focus on developing such participative approaches and further investigate the benefits of IDSS's that can be updated quickly and make it possible for a watershed manager to obtain a timely, holistic view and support for every aspect of planning and optimizing a WQMP. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1312 / 1329
页数:18
相关论文
共 96 条
[41]  
Li Y., 2011, Water quality concepts, sampling, and analyses
[42]   Water sampling: Traditional methods and new approaches in water sampling strategy [J].
Madrid, Yolanda ;
Zayas, Zoyne Pedrero .
TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 26 (04) :293-299
[43]   Revising river water quality monitoring networks using discrete entropy theory: the Jajrood River experience [J].
Mahjouri, Najmeh ;
Kerachian, Reza .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2011, 175 (1-4) :291-302
[44]  
Makela A., 1996, WATER QUALITY MONITO, P35
[45]   Evaluating sampling locations in river water quality monitoring networks: application of dynamic factor analysis and discrete entropy theory [J].
Memarzadeh, Milad ;
Mahjouri, Najmeh ;
Kerachian, Reza .
ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2013, 70 (06) :2577-2585
[46]   The determination of ecological status in shallow lakes -: a tested system (ECOFRAME) for implementation of the European Water Framework Directive [J].
Moss, B ;
Stephen, D ;
Alvarez, C ;
Becares, E ;
Van de Bund, W ;
Collings, SE ;
Van Donk, E ;
De Eyto, E ;
Feldmann, T ;
Fernández-Aláez, C ;
Fernández-Aláez, M ;
Franken, RJM ;
García-Criado, F ;
Gross, EM ;
Gyllström, M ;
Hansson, LA ;
Irvine, K ;
Järvalt, A ;
Jensen, JP ;
Jeppesen, E ;
Kairesalo, T ;
Kornijów, R ;
Krause, T ;
Künnap, H ;
Laas, A ;
Lille, E ;
Lorens, B ;
Luup, H ;
Miracle, MR ;
Noges, P ;
Noges, T ;
Nykänen, M ;
Ott, I ;
Peczula, W ;
Peeters, ETHM ;
Phillips, G ;
Romo, S ;
Russell, V ;
Salujoe, J ;
Scheffer, M ;
Siewertsen, K ;
Smal, H ;
Tesch, C ;
Timm, H ;
Tuvikene, L ;
Tonno, I ;
Virro, T ;
Vicente, E ;
Wilson, D .
AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2003, 13 (06) :507-549
[47]   The Water Framework Directive: Total environment or political compromise? [J].
Moss, Brian .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 400 (1-3) :32-41
[48]   Linkages between forest soils and water quality and quantity [J].
Neary, Daniel G. ;
Ice, George G. ;
Jackson, C. Rhett .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 258 (10) :2269-2281
[49]   Multi-objective, decision-based assessment of a water quality monitoring network in a river system [J].
Ning, SK ;
Chang, NB .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2002, 4 (01) :121-126
[50]   Multivariate statistical analysis of surface water quality based on correlations and variations in the data set [J].
Noori, R. ;
Sabahi, M. S. ;
Karbassi, A. R. ;
Baghvand, A. ;
Zadeh, H. Taati .
DESALINATION, 2010, 260 (1-3) :129-136