Pollination success in a deceptive orchid is enhanced by co-occurring rewarding magnet plants

被引:293
作者
Johnson, SD
Peter, CI
Nilsson, LA
Ågren, J
机构
[1] Univ Natal, Sch Bot & Zool, ZA-3209 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Plant Ecol, Evolutionary Biol Ctr, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Anacamptis morio; Bombus; competition; magnet species; mimicry; nectar; Orchidaceae; pollen limitation; population density; population size; transplant experiment;
D O I
10.1890/02-0471
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
It has been debated whether pollination success in nonrewarding plants that flower in association with nectar-producing plants will be diminished by competition for pollinator visits or, alternatively, enhanced through increased local abundance of pollinators (the magnet species effect). We experimentally evaluated these effects using the nonrewarding bumblebee-pollinated orchid Anacamptis morio and associated nectar-producing plants at a site in Sweden. Pollination success (estimated as pollen receipt and pollen removal) in A. morio was significantly greater for individuals translocated to patches of nectar-producing plants (Geum rivale and Allium schoenoprasum) than for individuals placed outside (similar to20 m away) such patches. These results provide support for the existence of a facilitative magnet species effect in the interaction between certain nectar plants and A. morio. To determine the spatial scale of these interactions, we correlated the visitation rate to flowers of A. morio with the density of sympatric nectar plants in 1-m(2) and 100-m(2) plots centered around groups of translocated plants, and at the level of whole meadows (similar to0.5-2 ha). Visitation rate to flowers of A. morio was not correlated with the 1-m(2) patch density of G. rivale and A. schoenoprasum, but showed a significant positive relationship with density of these nectar plants in 100-m(2) plots. In addition, visitation to flowers of A. morio was strongly and positively related to the density of A. schoenoprasum at the level of the meadow. Choice experiments showed that bees foraging on the purple flowers of A. schoenoprasum (a particularly effective magnet species) visit the purple flowers of A. morio more readily (47.6% of choices) than bees foraging on the yellow flowers of Lotus corniculatus (17% of choices). Overall similarity in flower color and shape may increase the probability that a pollinator will temporarily shift from a nectar-producing "magnet" plant to a nonrewarding plant. We discuss the possibility of a mimicry continuum between those orchids that exploit instinctive food-seeking behavior of pollinators and those that show an adaptive resemblance to nectar-producing plants.
引用
收藏
页码:2919 / 2927
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   FLORAL NEIGHBORHOOD AND POLLINATION SUCCESS IN 4 HUMMINGBIRD-POLLINATED CLOUD FOREST PLANT-SPECIES [J].
FEINSINGER, P ;
MURRAY, KG ;
KINSMAN, S ;
BUSBY, WH .
ECOLOGY, 1986, 67 (02) :449-464
[13]   Pollinator behavior and deceptive pollination: Learning process and floral evolution [J].
Ferdy, JB ;
Gouyon, PH ;
Moret, J ;
Godelle, B .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1998, 152 (05) :696-705
[14]   REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS AND INFLORESCENCE SIZE OF CALOPOGON-TUBEROSUS (ORCHIDACEAE) [J].
FIRMAGE, DH ;
COLE, FR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1988, 75 (09) :1371-1377
[15]   DANDELION AS A COMPETITOR TO FRUIT TREES FOR BEE VISITS [J].
FREE, JB .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1968, 5 (01) :169-&
[16]   Color choices by bumble bees (Bombus terrestris):: innate preferences and generalization after learning [J].
Gumbert, A .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2000, 48 (01) :36-43
[17]   Colour similarity to rewarding model plants affects pollination in a food deceptive orchid, Orchis boryi [J].
Gumbert, A ;
Kunze, J .
BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2001, 72 (03) :419-433
[18]  
Hamback PA, 2000, ECOLOGY, V81, P1784, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1784:ARIDTP]2.0.CO
[19]  
2
[20]   EVOLUTIONARY OPTIONS FOR MAXIMIZING POLLEN DISPERSAL OF ANIMAL-POLLINATED PLANTS [J].
HARDER, LD ;
THOMSON, JD .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1989, 133 (03) :323-344