Potential impact of (CET) carbon emissions trading on China's power sector: A perspective from different allowance allocation options

被引:194
作者
Cong, Rong-Gang [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Wei, Yi-Ming [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] N China Elect Power Univ, Sch Business Adm, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Policy & Management, Beijing 100080, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon emissions trading; Emission-based allocation; Output-based allocation; Agent-based model; ELECTRICITY MARKETS;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2010.06.013
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In Copenhagen climate conference China government promised that China would cut down carbon intensity 40-45% from 2005 by 2020. CET (carbon emissions trading) is an effective tool to reduce emissions. But because CET is not fully implemented in China up to now, how to design it and its potential impact are unknown to us. This paper studies the potential impact of introduction of CET on China's power sector and discusses the impact of different allocation options of allowances. Agent-based modeling is one appealing new methodology that has the potential to overcome some shortcomings of traditional methods. We establish an agent-based model, CETICEM (CET Introduced China Electricity Market), of introduction of CET to China. In CETICEM, six types of agents and two markets are modeled. We find that: (1) CET internalizes environment cost; increases the average electricity price by 12%; and transfers carbon price volatility to the electricity market, increasing electricity price volatility by 4%. (2) CET influences the relative cost of different power generation technologies through the carbon price, significantly increasing the proportion of environmentally friendly technologies; expensive solar power generation in particular develops significantly, with final proportion increasing by 14%. (3) Emission-based allocation brings about both higher electricity and carbon prices than by output-based allocation which encourages producers to be environmentally friendly. Therefore, output-based allocation would be more conducive to reducing emissions in the Chinese power sector. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:3921 / 3931
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[21]  
*NBS, 2008, CHIN EN STAT YB 1997
[22]  
Peng C., 2006, CHINA HYDROPOWER PRO
[23]   Emissions trading in China: A conceptual 'leapfrog' approach? [J].
Raufer, Roger ;
Li, Shaoyi .
ENERGY, 2009, 34 (07) :904-912
[24]  
*SERC, 2007, EL REG ANN REP INT R
[25]  
*SERC, 2008, MON REP IMPL TAR 200
[26]   CO2 emission trading within the European Union and Annex B countries:: the cement industry case [J].
Szabó, L ;
Hidalgo, I ;
Ciscar, JC ;
Soria, A .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (01) :72-87
[27]   The tradable-permits approach to protecting the commons: Lessons for climate change [J].
Tietenberg, T .
OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2003, 19 (03) :400-419
[28]  
Wei Y.M., 2008, China energy report 2008: carbon emission research