CT Screening and Follow-Up of Lung Nodules: Effects of Tube Current-Time Setting and Nodule Size and Density on Detectability and of Tube Current-Time Setting on Apparent Size

被引:36
作者
Christe, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
Torrente, Jaled Charimo [2 ]
Lin, Margaret [1 ]
Yen, Andrew [1 ]
Hallett, Rich [1 ]
Roychoudhury, Kingshuk [3 ]
Schmitzberger, Florian [1 ]
Vock, Peter [2 ]
Roos, Justus [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Bern, Dept Diagnost Intervent & Pediat Radiol, Inselspital, Univ Hosp, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[3] Univ Coll Cork, Dept Stat, Cork, Ireland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
CT; density; dose; lung nodules; sensitivity; volume measurement error; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; LOW-DOSE CT; PULMONARY NODULES; CHEST CT; VOLUME MEASUREMENTS; INTRAOBSERVER VARIABILITY; DOUBLING TIME; CANCER; INTEROBSERVER; RADIOLOGISTS;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.10.5288
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of the study was to quantify and compare the effect of CT dose and of size and density of nodules on the detectability of lung nodules and to quantify the influence of CT dose on the size of the nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS. From 50 patients a total of 125 cuboidal regions of interest (3 x 3 x 1.5 cm volumes) showing a single nodule (<= 8 mm) and 27 normal cuboids were selected. Image sets were reconstructed with the software from raw data simulating different dose levels: 300 (original dose), 220, 180, 140, 100, 80, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, 10, and 5 reference mAs. A logistic regression model was used to analyze detectability for three blinded readers. Odds ratios were calculated for nodule size smaller than 3 mm versus 3 mm and larger and for nodule attenuation of -300 HU and greater versus less than -300 HU. RESULTS. Tube current-time settings of 10 mAs and greater were not associated with a significant difference in individual reader sensitivity compared with the standard setting of 300 mAs. At 5 mAs only one reader had a significant decrease in sensitivity, from 82% to 77% (p = 0.0035). According to the odds ratios and logistic regression results, the strongest negative effect on sensitivity can be assumed for low nodule density followed by small nodule size and dose level. The mean nodule volume measurement error between 5 and 300 mAs was 2.2% +/- 18% (SD) and much lower than the interobserver volume measurement error rate of 38% +/- 45%. CONCLUSION. The results show the feasibility of a low-dose CT protocol at 10 mAs for follow-up of lung nodules. Computer-aided volume measurement in follow-up of lung nodules decreases interobserver variability.
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 630
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[11]  
Henschke CI, 2001, CANCER, V92, P153, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010701)92:1<153::AID-CNCR1303>3.0.CO
[12]  
2-S
[13]   CT screening for lung cancer: Frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules [J].
Henschke, CI ;
Yankelevitz, DF ;
Mirtcheva, R ;
McGuinness, G ;
McCauley, D ;
Miettinen, OS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (05) :1053-1057
[14]  
Hetmaniak Y, 2003, J RADIOL, V84, P399
[15]  
Hosmer W., 2000, Applied Logistic Regression, VSecond
[16]   Small pulmonary nodules: Volume measurement at chest CT - Phantom study [J].
Ko, JP ;
Rusinek, H ;
Jacobs, EL ;
Babb, JS ;
Betke, M ;
McGuinness, G ;
Naidich, DP .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 228 (03) :864-870
[17]   Wavelet compression of low-dose chest CT data: Effect on lung nodule detection [J].
Ko, JP ;
Rusinek, H ;
Naidich, DP ;
McGuinness, G ;
Rubinowitz, AN ;
Leitman, BS ;
Martino, JM .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 228 (01) :70-75
[18]   Lung nodule detection on chest CT: Evaluation of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system [J].
Lee, IJ ;
Gamsu, G ;
Czum, J ;
Wu, N ;
Johnson, R ;
Chakrapani, S .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 6 (02) :89-93
[19]   The potential contribution of a computer-aided detection system for lung nodule detection in multidetector row computed tomography [J].
Lee, JW ;
Goo, JM ;
Lee, HJ ;
Kim, JH ;
Kim, S ;
Kim, YT .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2004, 39 (11) :649-655
[20]   Computer-aided detection of peripheral lung cancers missed at CT: ROC analyses without and with localization [J].
Li, F ;
Arimura, H ;
Suzuki, K ;
Shiraishi, J ;
Li, Q ;
Abe, H ;
Engelmann, R ;
Sone, S ;
MacMahon, H ;
Doi, K .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (02) :684-690