Lesion volume measurement in multiple sclerosis: How important is accurate repositioning

被引:44
作者
GawneCain, ML [1 ]
Webb, S [1 ]
Tofts, P [1 ]
Miller, DH [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL NATL HOSP NEUROL & NEUROSURG, INST NEUROL, NMR RES GRP, LONDON WC1N 3BG, ENGLAND
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; multiple sclerosis; lesion load; reproducibility;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.1880060502
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This study was designed to estimate the contribution of repositioning inaccuracies to measured intracranial lesion volumes in multiple sclerosis (MS), Five patients with MS were each scanned 10 times, using spin-echo imaging (2,000/34/90), contiguous 5-mm slices, and different scanning positions. The maximum displacements from baseline were +/-4 degrees (AP rotation) and 3 mm (slice offset), Lesion volume was measured twice for each scan using a semiautomated contour technique, Measured lesion volumes ranged from 4,328 mm(3) to 164,831 mm(3). The mean intrarater coefficient of variation (CV) calculated for individual patients ranged from 1.1 to 4% (median, 1.7%). Using analysis of variance, the overall variance and CV due to altered scan position were greater than that due to rater error (repositioning CV 4.0%, intrarater CV 3.5%). The worst-case difference between volumes in the same patient ranged from 8.9 to 32% (median, 9.9%). Both rater and repositioning errors were greater for smaller lesion volumes. The maximum potential error due to repositioning inaccuracies is of a similar magnitude to the 5 to 10% expected change in lesion volume over 1 year. This study justifies continued careful attention to accuracy in repositioning for serial MR studies in patients with MS.
引用
收藏
页码:705 / 713
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DESIGN ANAL CLIN EXP
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   MRI SEGMENTATION - METHODS AND APPLICATIONS [J].
CLARKE, LP ;
VELTHUIZEN, RP ;
CAMACHO, MA ;
HEINE, JJ ;
VAIDYANATHAN, M ;
HALL, LO ;
THATCHER, RW ;
SILBIGER, ML .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1995, 13 (03) :343-368
[4]  
DUQUETTE P, 1995, NEUROLOGY, V45, P1277
[5]   CORRELATIONS BETWEEN CHANGES IN DISABILITY AND T-2-WEIGHTED BRAIN MRI ACTIVITY IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS - A FOLLOW-UP-STUDY [J].
FILIPPI, M ;
PATY, DW ;
KAPPOS, L ;
BARKHOF, F ;
COMPSTON, DAS ;
THOMPSON, AJ ;
ZHAO, GJ ;
WILES, CM ;
MCDONALD, WI ;
MILLER, DH .
NEUROLOGY, 1995, 45 (02) :255-260
[6]   MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING LESION ENLARGEMENT IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS - DISEASE-RELATED ACTIVITY, CHANCE OCCURRENCE, OR MEASUREMENT ARTIFACT [J].
GOODKIN, DE ;
ROSS, JS ;
MEDENDORP, SV ;
KONESCSNI, J ;
RUDICK, RA .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1992, 49 (03) :261-263
[7]  
GRIMAUD J, 1996, IN PRESS MAGN RESON
[8]   MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING IN THE EVALUATION OF TREATMENT IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS [J].
KAPPOS, L ;
STADT, D ;
RATZKA, M ;
KEIL, W ;
SCHNEIDERBANGERGRYGIER, S ;
HEITZER, T ;
POSER, S ;
NADJMI, M .
NEURORADIOLOGY, 1988, 30 (04) :299-302
[9]  
MACMANUS DG, 1989, P SOC MAG RESON, V2, P617
[10]   MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN THE EVALUATION OF CLINICAL-TRIALS IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS [J].
PATY, DW ;
LI, DKB ;
OGER, JJF ;
KASTRUKOFF, L ;
KOOPMANS, R ;
TANTON, E ;
ZHAO, GJ .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1994, 36 :S95-S96