The MLC tongue-and-groove effect on IMRT dose distributions

被引:91
作者
Deng, J [1 ]
Pawlicki, T [1 ]
Chen, Y [1 ]
Li, JS [1 ]
Jiang, SB [1 ]
Ma, CM [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/46/4/310
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
We have investigated the tongue-and-groove effect on the IMRT dose distributions for a Varian MLC. We have compared the dose distributions calculated using the intensity maps with and without the tongue-and-groove effect. Our results showed that, for one intensity-modulated treatment field, the maximum tongue-and-groove effect could be up to 10% of the maximum dose in the dose distributions. For an IMRT treatment with multiple gantry angles (greater than or equal to5), the difference between the dose distributions with and without the tongue-and-groove effect was hardly visible, less than 1.6% for the two typical clinical cases studied. After considering the patient setup errors, the dose distributions were smoothed with reduced and insignificant differences between plans with and without the tongue-and-groove effect. Therefore, for a multiple-field IMRT plan (greater than or equal to5), the tongue-and-groove effect on the IMRT dose distributions will be generally clinically insignificant due to the smearing effect of individual fields. The tongue-and-groove effect on an IMRT plan with small number of fields (<5) will vary depending on the number of fields in a plan (coplanar or non-coplanar), the MLC leaf sequences and the patient setup uncertainty, and may be significant (>5% of maximum dose) in some cases, especially when the patient setup uncertainty is small (less than or equal to2 mm).
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1060
页数:22
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
BIELAJEW AF, 1987, NUCL INSTRUM METH B, V18, P165
[2]  
BOYER AL, 1998, MED PHYS, V25, pA200
[3]  
BRAHME A, 1988, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V164, P343
[4]   Calculation of x-ray transmission through a multileaf collimator [J].
Chen, Y ;
Boyer, AL ;
Ma, CM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (08) :1717-1726
[5]   DOSE CALCULATION FOR PHOTON BEAMS WITH INTENSITY MODULATION GENERATED BY DYNAMIC JAW OR MULTILEAF COLLIMATIONS [J].
CHUI, CS ;
LOSASSO, T ;
SPIROU, S .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (08) :1237-1244
[6]   THE GENERATION OF INTENSITY-MODULATED FIELDS FOR CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY BY DYNAMIC COLLIMATION [J].
CONVERY, DJ ;
ROSENBLOOM, ME .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1992, 37 (06) :1359-1374
[7]   Photon beam characterization and modelling for Monte Carlo treatment planning [J].
Deng, J ;
Jiang, SB ;
Kapur, A ;
Li, JS ;
Pawlicki, T ;
Ma, CM .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (02) :411-427
[8]   Leaf trajectory calculation for dynamic multileaf collimation to realize optimized fluence profiles [J].
Dirkx, MLP ;
Heijmen, BJM ;
van Santvoort, JPC .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (05) :1171-1184
[9]   CHARACTERIZATION OF A MULTILEAF COLLIMATOR SYSTEM [J].
GALVIN, JM ;
SMITH, AR ;
LALLY, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 25 (02) :181-192
[10]   Monitor chamber backscatter for intensity modulated radiation therapy using multileaf collimators [J].
Hounsell, AR .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (02) :445-454