The role of plant defence proteins in fungal pathogenesis

被引:214
作者
Ferreira, Ricardo B. [1 ]
Monteiro, Sara
Freitas, Regina
Santos, Claudia N.
Chen, Zhenjia
Batista, Luis M.
Duarte, Joao
Borges, Alexandre
Teixeira, Artur R.
机构
[1] Univ Tecn Lisboa, Inst Super Agronom, Dept Bot & Engn Biol, P-1349017 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Nova Lisboa, Inst Tecnol Quim & Biol, Dis & Stress Biol Lab, P-2781901 Oeiras, Portugal
关键词
D O I
10.1111/J.1364-3703.2007.00419.X
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
It is becoming increasingly evident that a plant-pathogen interaction may be compared to an open warfare, whose major weapons are proteins synthesized by both organisms. These weapons were gradually developed in what must have been a multimillion-year evolutionary game of ping-pong. The outcome of each battle results in the establishment of resistance or pathogenesis. The plethora of resistance mechanisms exhibited by plants may be grouped into constitutive and inducible, and range from morphological to structural and chemical defences. Most of these mechanisms are defensive, exhibiting a passive role, but some are highly active against pathogens, using as major targets the fungal cell wall, the plasma membrane or intracellular targets. A considerable overlap exists between pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins and antifungal proteins. However, many of the now considered 17 families of PR proteins do not present any known role as antipathogen activity, whereas among the 13 classes of antifungal proteins, most are not PR proteins. Discovery of novel antifungal proteins and peptides continues at a rapid pace. In their long coevolution with plants, phytopathogens have evolved ways to avoid or circumvent the plant defence weaponry. These include protection of fungal structures from plant defence reactions, inhibition of elicitor-induced plant defence responses and suppression of plant defences. A detailed understanding of the molecular events that take place during a plant-pathogen interaction is an essential goal for disease control in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 700
页数:24
相关论文
共 313 条
[81]   Antimicrobial proteins in induced plant defense [J].
Fritig, B ;
Heitz, T ;
Legrand, M .
CURRENT OPINION IN IMMUNOLOGY, 1998, 10 (01) :16-22
[82]   Site-directed mutagenesis of active site residues in a class I endochitinase from chestnut seeds [J].
Garcia-Casado, G ;
Collada, C ;
Allona, I ;
Casado, R ;
Pacios, LF ;
Aragoncillo, C ;
Gomez, L .
GLYCOBIOLOGY, 1998, 8 (10) :1021-1028
[83]  
Garcia-Olmedo Francisco, 1995, Trends in Microbiology, V3, P72, DOI 10.1016/S0966-842X(00)88879-4
[84]  
GIRBES T, 1993, J BIOL CHEM, V268, P18195
[85]   Puroindolines: Their role in grain hardness and plant defence [J].
Giroux, MJ ;
Sripo, T ;
Gerhardt, S ;
Sherwood, J .
BIOTECHNOLOGY & GENETIC ENGINEERING REVIEWS, VOL 20, 2003, 20 :277-290
[86]   Ultrastructure and immunolabelling of fungi cells treated with Vigna unguiculata vicilins (7S storage proteins) [J].
Gomes, VM ;
Da Cunha, M ;
Miguens, FC ;
Fernandes, KVS ;
Rose, TL ;
Xavier, J .
PLANT SCIENCE, 1998, 138 (01) :81-89
[87]   Vicilin storage proteins from Vigna unguiculata (legume) seeds inhibit fungal growth [J].
Gomes, VM ;
Mosqueda, MI ;
BlancoLabra, A ;
Sales, MP ;
Fernandes, KVS ;
Cordeiro, RA ;
Xavier, J .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1997, 45 (10) :4110-4115
[88]  
Gomes VM, 1996, J SCI FOOD AGR, V72, P86, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199609)72:1&lt
[89]  
86::AID-JSFA624&gt
[90]  
3.0.CO