Results of MR Imaging Screening for Breast Cancer in High-Risk Patients with Lobular Carcinoma in Situ

被引:50
作者
Friedlander, Lauren C. [1 ]
Roth, Susan Orel [2 ]
Gavenonis, Sara C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Presbyterian, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Radiol Breast Imaging, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
HIGH FAMILIAL RISK; WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; SURVEILLANCE; MULTICENTER; ULTRASOUND; CARRIERS;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.11103516
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
Purpose: To determine the outcome of screening breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examinations performed in patients with lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) at the authors' institution. Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the institutional review board and was compliant with HIPAA. Retrospective review of screening breast MR imaging examinations at the institution from 1996 through September 2009 was performed in patients with prior biopsies demonstrating LCIS. Patients with prior breast cancer diagnosis were excluded. American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) recommendations were recorded. Pathologic results of all consequent biopsies were obtained from the electronic medical records. Results: A total of 445 breast MR examinations in 198 patients with LCIS were identified. Of these, 308 were screening examinations in 134 patients. One patient was a BRCA mutation carrier and was excluded. Of the remaining 307 screening examinations, 254 (82.7%) had BI-RADS category 1 or 2 findings; 27 (8.8%) had BI-RADS category 3 findings; and 27 (8.8%) had B-IRADS category 4 or 5 findings. Of the 27 studies that led to a biopsy recommendation, 10 (37%) yielded benign pathologic findings, five (18.5%) yielded malignant pathologic findings, and seven (25.9%) yielded high-risk lesions. Of the 27 studies with BI-RADS 3 findings, two (7.4%) resulted in biopsy, findings of both were benign. Overall, malignancy was detected in five of 307 screening studies (1.6%) and in five of 133 screened patients (3.8%). The positive predictive value (PPV) of these screening studies for which biopsy was recommended was 18.5%. The PPV 3 (studies for which biopsy was recommended and actually performed, as described in the BI-RADS guidelines) was 23.8%. Conclusion: Screening breast MR imaging helped identify breast cancer in LCIS patients at a rate similar to that shown in high-risk populations for whom screening breast MR imaging is currently consistently recommended. (C) RSNA, 2011
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 427
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2013, ATLAS BREAST IMAGING
[2]
Premalignant and in situ breast disease: Biology and clinical implications [J].
Arpino, G ;
Laucirica, R ;
Elledge, RM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 143 (06) :446-457
[3]
National trends and practices in breast MRI [J].
Bassett, Lawrence W. ;
Dhaliwal, Sonia G. ;
Eradat, Jilbert ;
Khan, Omer ;
Farria, Dionne F. ;
Brenner, R. James ;
Sayre, James W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 191 (02) :332-339
[4]
Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer [J].
Berry, DA ;
Cronin, KA ;
Plevritis, SK ;
Fryback, DG ;
Clarke, L ;
Zelen, M ;
Mandelblatt, JS ;
Yakovlev, AY ;
Habbema, JDF ;
Feuer, EJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (17) :1784-1792
[5]
Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis [J].
Bevers, Therese B. ;
Anderson, Benjamin O. ;
Bonaccio, Ermelinda ;
Buys, Sandra ;
Daly, Mary B. ;
Dempsey, Peter J. ;
Farrar, William B. ;
Fleming, Irving ;
Garber, Judy E. ;
Harris, Randall E. ;
Heerdt, Alexandra S. ;
Helvie, Mark ;
Huff, John G. ;
Khakpour, Nazanin ;
Khan, Seema A. ;
Krontiras, Helen ;
Lyman, Gary ;
Rafferty, Elizabeth ;
Shaw, Sara ;
Smith, Mary Lou ;
Tsangaris, Theodore N. ;
Williams, Cheryl ;
Yaneeklov, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2009, 7 (10) :1060-1096
[6]
Pathologic findings from the national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project - Twelve-year observations concerning lobular carcinoma in situ [J].
Fisher, ER ;
Land, SR ;
Fisher, B ;
Mamounas, E ;
Gilarski, L ;
Wolmark, N .
CANCER, 2004, 100 (02) :238-244
[7]
Cancer Statistics, 2010 (vol 60, pg 277, 2010) [J].
Jemal, A. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2011, 61 (02) :134-134
[8]
Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition [J].
Kriege, M ;
Brekelmans, CTM ;
Boetes, C ;
Besnard, PE ;
Zonderland, HM ;
Obdeijn, IM ;
Manoliu, RA ;
Kok, T ;
Peterse, H ;
Tilanus-Linthorst, MMA ;
Muller, SH ;
Meijer, S ;
Oosterwijk, JC ;
Beex, LVAM ;
Tollenaar, RAEM ;
de Koning, HJ ;
Rutgers, EJT ;
Klijn, JGM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (05) :427-437
[9]
Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer [J].
Kuhl, CK ;
Schrading, S ;
Leutner, CC ;
Morakkabati-Spitz, N ;
Wardelmann, E ;
Fimmers, R ;
Kuhn, W ;
Schild, HH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (33) :8469-8476
[10]
Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: Preliminary results [J].
Kuhl, CK ;
Schmutzler, RK ;
Leutner, CC ;
Kempe, A ;
Wardelmann, E ;
Hocke, A ;
Maringa, M ;
Pfeifer, U ;
Krebs, D ;
Schild, HH .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (01) :267-279