The fallacy of "only the strong survive": The effects of extrinsic motivation on the persistence decisions for under-performing firms

被引:201
作者
DeTienne, Dawn R. [1 ]
Shepherd, Dean A. [2 ]
De Castro, Julio O. [3 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Bloomington, IN 47406 USA
[3] Inst Empresa, Madrid 28006, Spain
关键词
threshold theory; persistence; commitment; conjoint analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.09.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Under-performing firms persist even though existing theoretical perspectives indicate that they should be selected out of the market. Building upon threshold theory [Gimeno, J., Folta, T., Cooper, A., Woo, C., 1997. Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 42, 750-783.] and using Staw's [Staw, B.M., 1981. The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review 6 (4), 577-587.] theoretical model of commitment to a course of action, we explore and test the factors that lead entrepreneurs to persist with underperforming firms. We found environmental munificence, personal investment, personal options, previous organizational success, and perceived collective efficacy impact the decision to persist with an under-performing firm. In addition, extrinsic motivation moderates those relationships. This research adds to the growing literature on highly persistent, under-performing firms and complements and extends threshold theory. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 546
页数:19
相关论文
共 107 条
[51]   THE HYPOTHESIZED EFFECTS OF ABILITY IN THE TURNOVER PROCESS [J].
JACKOFSKY, EF ;
PETERS, LH .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1983, 8 (01) :46-49
[52]   Can real-options analysis improve decision-making? Promises and pitfalls [J].
Janney, JJ ;
Dess, GG .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2004, 18 (04) :60-75
[53]  
JENSEN MC, 1976, J FINANCIAL EC, V3
[54]   Change in job values during the transition to adulthood [J].
Johnson, MK .
WORK AND OCCUPATIONS, 2001, 28 (03) :315-345
[55]   A LONGITUDINAL ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF SELECTED ORGANIZATIONAL INFLUENCES ON SALESPEOPLE ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT DURING EARLY EMPLOYMENT [J].
JOHNSTON, MW ;
PARASURAMAN, A ;
FUTRELL, CM ;
BLACK, WC .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1990, 27 (03) :333-344
[56]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[57]  
Kanfer R., 1990, HDB IND ORG PSYCHOL, P75, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1744-6570.1973.TB0
[58]  
Karakaya F, 2000, PSYCHOL MARKET, V17, P651, DOI 10.1002/1520-6793(200008)17:8<651::AID-MAR1>3.0.CO
[59]  
2-K
[60]   Why software projects escalate: An empirical analysis and test of four theoretical models [J].
Keil, M ;
Mann, J ;
Rai, A .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2000, 24 (04) :631-664