National Biometry Audit

被引:20
作者
Gale, RP
Saha, N
Johnston, RL
机构
[1] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Cambridge, England
[2] Leeds Gen Infirm, Dept Ophthalmol, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Cheltenham Gen Hosp, Gloucestershire Eye Dept, Cheltenham GL53 7AN, Glos, England
关键词
cataract; biometry; IOL calculation formulae; guidelines; electronic patient records; prediction error;
D O I
10.1038/sj.eye.6700550
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 [眼科学];
摘要
Purpose To determine compliance with the Royal College of Ophthalmologists' (RCOphth) biometry guidelines. Method A structured telephone questionnaire of individuals who perform biometry in all eye departments in the United Kingdom (UK). Results A biometrist was interviewed in 107 of the UK's 178 eye departments. Nurses alone run the biometry service in 58% of departments, orthoptists alone in 13%, junior doctors alone in 6%, optometrists alone in 3%, and a combination of staff in 20%. Of the staff interviewed, 37% had been on external biometry training courses. One intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formula was used for all eyes in 61% of departments with 17% using the obsolete SRK II formula, 36% of departments used two or more formulae and only 4% adhered to the RCOphth guidelines to use Hoffer Q in eyes with axial lengths o22.0mm, an average of all three formulae in eyes between 22.0 and 24.5 mm, Holladay in eyes between 24.6 and 26.0 mm, and SRK/T in eyes >26.0 mm. Audit of refractive results was claimed by 71% of units but in only 17 (16%) did the biometrist know the percentage of eyes with a prediction error less than or equal to1D. Conclusion This study demonstrates poor awareness and/or implementation of the RCOphth biometry guidelines and indicates that audits are either not highlighting poor results or are not resulting in a change in practice. The guidelines should be updated to emphasise the importance of customising A constants and to set benchmark standards for prediction error.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 66
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]
Accuracy and reproducibility of biometry using partial coherence interferometry [J].
Connors, R ;
Boseman, P ;
Olson, RJ .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (02) :235-238
[2]
Improved prediction of intraocular lens power using partial coherence interferometry [J].
Findl, O ;
Drexler, W ;
Menapace, R ;
Heinzl, H ;
Hitzenberger, CK ;
Fercher, AF .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 27 (06) :861-867
[3]
BIOMETRY OF 7,500 CATARACTOUS EYES [J].
HOFFER, KJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1980, 90 (03) :360-368
[4]
Clinical results using the Holladay 2 intraocular lens power formula [J].
Hoffer, KJ .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 26 (08) :1233-1237
[6]
Standardizing constants for ultrasonic biometry, keratometry, and intraocular lens power calculations [J].
Holladay, JT .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 23 (09) :1356-1370
[7]
A 3-PART SYSTEM FOR REFINING INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER CALCULATIONS [J].
HOLLADAY, JT ;
PRAGER, TC ;
CHANDLER, TY ;
MUSGROVE, KH ;
LEWIS, JW ;
RUIZ, RS .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1988, 14 (01) :17-24
[8]
Extracapsular cataract extraction compared with small incision surgery by phacoemulsification: a randomised trial [J].
Minassian, DC ;
Rosen, P ;
Dart, JKG ;
Reidy, A ;
Desai, P ;
Sidhu, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 85 (07) :822-829
[9]
Refractive error and visual outcome after cataract extraction [J].
Murphy, C ;
Tuft, SJ ;
Minassian, DC .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (01) :62-66
[10]
SOURCES OF ERROR IN INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER CALCULATION [J].
OLSEN, T .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1992, 18 (02) :125-129