共 16 条
National Biometry Audit
被引:20
作者:
Gale, RP
Saha, N
Johnston, RL
机构:
[1] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Cambridge, England
[2] Leeds Gen Infirm, Dept Ophthalmol, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Cheltenham Gen Hosp, Gloucestershire Eye Dept, Cheltenham GL53 7AN, Glos, England
来源:
关键词:
cataract;
biometry;
IOL calculation formulae;
guidelines;
electronic patient records;
prediction error;
D O I:
10.1038/sj.eye.6700550
中图分类号:
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号:
100212 [眼科学];
摘要:
Purpose To determine compliance with the Royal College of Ophthalmologists' (RCOphth) biometry guidelines. Method A structured telephone questionnaire of individuals who perform biometry in all eye departments in the United Kingdom (UK). Results A biometrist was interviewed in 107 of the UK's 178 eye departments. Nurses alone run the biometry service in 58% of departments, orthoptists alone in 13%, junior doctors alone in 6%, optometrists alone in 3%, and a combination of staff in 20%. Of the staff interviewed, 37% had been on external biometry training courses. One intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formula was used for all eyes in 61% of departments with 17% using the obsolete SRK II formula, 36% of departments used two or more formulae and only 4% adhered to the RCOphth guidelines to use Hoffer Q in eyes with axial lengths o22.0mm, an average of all three formulae in eyes between 22.0 and 24.5 mm, Holladay in eyes between 24.6 and 26.0 mm, and SRK/T in eyes >26.0 mm. Audit of refractive results was claimed by 71% of units but in only 17 (16%) did the biometrist know the percentage of eyes with a prediction error less than or equal to1D. Conclusion This study demonstrates poor awareness and/or implementation of the RCOphth biometry guidelines and indicates that audits are either not highlighting poor results or are not resulting in a change in practice. The guidelines should be updated to emphasise the importance of customising A constants and to set benchmark standards for prediction error.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 66
页数:4
相关论文

