Alcohol-free mouthrinse solutions to reduce supragingival plaque regrowth and vitality - A controlled clinical study

被引:62
作者
Arweiler, NB [1 ]
Netuschil, L [1 ]
Reich, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saarland, Dept Periodontol & Conservat Dent, D-66421 Homburg, Germany
关键词
alcohol; antimicrobial mouthrinses; amine fluoride/stannous; fluoride; chlorhexidine; triclosan; supragingival plaque; bacteria vitality;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028002168.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and antibacterial properties of alcohol-free mouthrinses, an amine fluoride/stannous fluoride mouthrinse (ASF) and two triclosan solutions in comparison with a chlorhexidine and a placebo rinse. Material and methods: In a double-blind, randomised 5-cell cross-over 4-day plaque regrowth study, 19 volunteers rinsed 2 x a day with 15 mi of each of the distributed solutions. Each test cycle was followed by a 10 days wash-out period. On day 0 of each test week, volunteers received a dental prophylaxis. Thereafter they refrained from all mechanical oral hygiene procedures for the next four days. Plaque regrowth was assessed daily by the plaque index and on day 4 by calculating the plaque area with a computer program after disclosure and photography of the front teeth. The vitality of the plaque was examined on days 1 to 4 by the vital fluorescence technique. Results: 19 participants completed the study. Compared to the placebo the ASF solution showed 15.7% (p>0.5), 30.6% (p<0.001), 40.5% (p<0.001) and 44.7% (p<0.001) reductions on the consecutive days 1-4 in plaque index and a reduction of 61.9% in plaque area. The decrease of vitality of supragingival plaque was highly significant compared to placebo on every test day ranging between 30.9% and 36.6%. A reduction in plaque index from 19.4% (p<0.01) on day 2, 34.9% (p<0.001) on day 3 and 40.4% (p<0.001) on day 4 concommitant with a reduction in plaque area of 48.9% (p<0.001) was noted for alcohol-free chlorhexidine. Concerning the vitality chlorhexidine reduced the percentage of vital bacteria significantly on every day (16.0% to 24.9%). The reductions in mean plaque index for the 0.15% triclosan solution during the test period were 6.3%, 22.4%, 24.6% and 36% and in plaque area 41.8%. Vitality was significantly reduced at every day compared to placebo. Plaque Index reduction with the 0.02% triclosan increased from 15.3% (day 2) to 31.0% (day 4) and a reduction of 23.6% was seen in plaque area. A significant effect concerning the vitality of the plaque was only found at the first and the last day of the test cycle. Conclusion: Alcohol-free mouthrinse solutions were shown to be effective in reducing both plaque accumulation and plaque biofilm vitality compared to a placebo solution.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 174
页数:7
相关论文
共 55 条
[31]  
NETUSCHIL L, 1997, PARONDONTOLOGIE, V8, P7
[32]  
NETUSCHIL L, 1997, SELBSTMEDIKATION ARZ, V18, P1
[33]   RESIDUAL EFFECT OF CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE IN 4-DAY PLAQUE REGROWTH CROSSOVER TRIALS, AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR STUDY DESIGN [J].
NEWCOMBE, RG ;
ADDY, M ;
MCKEOWN, S .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 30 (05) :319-324
[34]   CROSSOVER TRIALS COMPARING SEVERAL TREATMENTS [J].
NEWCOMBE, RG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1992, 19 (10) :785-787
[35]  
Penugonda B., 1994, Journal of Clinical Dentistry, V5, P60
[36]   What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments [J].
Perneger, TV .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7139) :1236-1238
[37]   THE INFLUENCE OF GINGIVAL INFLAMMATION, TOOTH TYPE, AND TIMING ON THE RATE OF PLAQUE-FORMATION [J].
QUIRYNEN, M ;
DEKEYSER, C ;
VANSTEENBERGHE, D .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1991, 62 (03) :219-222
[38]   IS EARLY PLAQUE GROWTH-RATE CONSTANT WITH TIME [J].
QUIRYNEN, M ;
VANSTEENBERGHE, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1989, 16 (05) :278-283
[39]  
RAMBERG P, 1995, J CLIN PERIODONTOL, V22, P85
[40]   The effects of antimicrobial mouthrinses on de novo plaque formation at sites with healthy and inflamed gingivae [J].
Ramberg, P ;
Furuichi, Y ;
Volpe, AR ;
Gaffar, A ;
Lindhe, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1996, 23 (01) :7-11