The biomechanical effect of pedicle screw hubbing on pullout resistance in the thoracic spine

被引:41
作者
Paik, Haines [1 ]
Dmitriev, Anton E. [1 ,2 ]
Lehman, Ronald A., Jr. [1 ,2 ]
Gaume, Rachel E. [1 ,2 ]
Ambati, Divya V. [1 ,2 ]
Kang, Daniel G. [1 ]
Lenke, Lawrence G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Walter Reed Natl Mil Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Rehabil, Bethesda, MD 20889 USA
[2] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
Hubbing; Thoracic; Biomechanic; Pedicle screw; Pullout strength; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INSERTIONAL TORQUE; LUMBOSACRAL SPINE; FIXATION; STRENGTH; PLACEMENT; LUMBAR; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2012.03.020
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The biomechanical fixation strength afforded by pedicle screws has been strongly correlated with bone mineral density. It has been postulated that "hubbing" the head of the pedicle screw against the dorsal laminar cortex provides a load-sharing effect, thereby limiting cephalocaudad toggling and improving the pullout resistance of the pedicle screw. PURPOSE: To evaluate the pullout strength (POS) of monoaxial hubbed pedicle screws versus standard fixation in the thoracic spine. STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical investigation. METHODS: Twenty-two human cadaveric thoracic vertebrae were acquired and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanned. Osteoporotic (n=16) and normal (n=6) specimens were instrumented with a 5.0x35-mm pedicle screw on one side in a standard fashion. In the contralateral pedicle, 5.0x30-mm screw was inserted with hubbing of the screw into the dorsal lamina. A difference in screw length was used to achieve equivalent depth of insertion. After 2,000 cycles of cephalocaudad toggling, screws were pulled out with the tensile force oriented to the midline of the spine and peak POS measured in newtons (N). Four additional specimens were subjected to micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis to evaluate internal pedicle architecture after screw insertion. RESULTS: Hubbed screws resulted in significantly lower POS (290.5 +/- 142.4 N) compared with standard pedicle screws (511.5 +/- 242.8 N; p=.00). This finding was evident in both normal and osteoporotic vertebrae based on independent subgroup post hoc analyses (p<.05). As a result of hubbing, half of the specimens fractured through the lamina or superior articular facet (SAF). No fractures occurred on the control side. There was no difference in mean POS for hubbed screws with and without fracture; however, further micro-CT analysis revealed the presence of internal fracture propagation for those specimens that did not have any external signs of failure. CONCLUSIONS: Hubbing pedicle screws results in significantly decreased POS compared with conventional pedicle screws. Hubbing predisposes toward iatrogenic fracture of the dorsal lamina, transverse process, or SAF during insertion. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 424
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
Abshire B B, 2001, Spine J, V1, P408, DOI 10.1016/S1529-9430(01)00119-X
[2]
CORRELATIONS BETWEEN SCREW HOLE PREPARATION, TORQUE OF INSERTION, AND PULLOUT STRENGTH FOR SPINAL SCREWS [J].
DAFTARI, TK ;
HORTON, WC ;
HUTTON, WC .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1994, 7 (02) :139-145
[3]
Increase of pullout strength of spinal pedicle screws with conical core: biomechanical tests and finite element analyses [J].
Hsu, CC ;
Chao, CK ;
Wang, JL ;
Hou, SM ;
Tsai, YT ;
Lin, J .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2005, 23 (04) :788-794
[4]
Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: Is it safe? [J].
Kim, YJ ;
Lenke, LG ;
Bridwell, KH ;
Cho, YSS ;
Riew, KD .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (03) :333-342
[5]
Krag M H, 1988, J Spinal Disord, V1, P287
[6]
KRAG MH, 1986, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P75
[7]
Structures at risk following anterior instrumented spinal fusion for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis [J].
Kuklo, TR ;
Lehman, RA ;
Lenke, LG .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2005, 18 :S58-S64
[8]
Effect of various tapping diameters on insertion of thoracic pedicle screws: A biomechanical analysis [J].
Kuklo, TR ;
Lehman, RA .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (18) :2066-2071
[9]
Kuklo TR, 2006, 13 ANN INT M ADV SPI
[10]
Insertional torque and pull-out strengths of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws in cadaveric bone [J].
Kwok, AWL ;
Finkelstein, JA ;
Woodside, T ;
Hearn, TC ;
Hu, RW .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (21) :2429-2434