Evaluation of the analytical anisotropic algorithm in an extreme water-lung interface phantom using Monte Carlo dose calculations

被引:55
作者
Gagne, Isabelle Marie
Zavgorodni, Sergei
机构
[1] Vancouver Isl Ctr, Dept Med Phys, British Columbia Canc Agcy, Victoria, BC, Canada
[2] Univ Victoria, Dept Phys & Astron, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2007年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
lung inhomogeneity correction; Monte Carlo calculations; analytical anisotropic algorithm; pencil beam convolution; AAA; PBC;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v8i1.2324
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Our study compares the performance of the analytical anisotropic algorithm ( AAA), a new superposition-convolution algorithm recently implemented in the Eclipse (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) Integrated Treatment Planning System (TPS), to that of the pencil beam convolution (PBC) algorithm in an extreme (C-shaped, horizontal and vertical boundaries) water-lung interface phantom. Monte Carlo ( MC) calculated dose distributions for a variety of clinical beam configurations at nominal energies of 6-MV and 18-MV are used as benchmarks in the comparison. Dose profiles extracted at three depths ( 4, 10, and 16 cm), two-dimensional (2D) maps of the dose differences, and dose difference statistics are used to quantify the accuracy of both photon-dose calculation algorithms. Results show that the AAA is considerably more accurate than the PBC, with the standard deviation of the dose differences within a region encompassing the lung block reduced by a factor of 2 and more. Confidence limits with the AAA were 4% or less for all beam configurations investigated; with the PBC, confidence limits ranged from 3.5% to 11.2%. Finally, AAA calculations for the small 4 x 4 18-MV beam, which is poorly modeled by PBC (dose differences as high as 16.1%), provided the same accuracy as the PBC model of the 6-MV beams commonly acceptable in clinical situations.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 46
页数:14
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Dose calculations for external photon beams in radiotherapy [J].
Ahnesjö, A ;
Aspradakis, MM .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (11) :R99-R155
[2]  
*AM ASS PHYS MED, 1998, 62 AAPM AM I PHYS
[3]   A technique for the fast calculation of three-dimensional photon dose distributions using the superposition model [J].
Aspradakis, MM ;
Redpath, AT .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1997, 42 (08) :1475-1489
[4]   Measured lung dose correction factors for 50 MV photons [J].
Blomquist, M ;
Karlsson, M .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (11) :3225-3234
[5]   DOSIMETRIC PRECISION REQUIREMENTS IN RADIATION-THERAPY [J].
BRAHME, A .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA ONCOLOGY, 1984, 23 (05) :379-391
[6]  
Brahme A., 1988, ACTA ONCOL S, V1, P1
[7]   Verification of lung dose in an anthropomorphic phantom calculated by the collapsed cone convolution method [J].
Butson, MJ ;
Elferink, R ;
Cheung, T ;
Yu, PKN ;
Stokes, M ;
Quach, KY ;
Metcalfe, P .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (11) :N143-N149
[8]   Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium [J].
Carrasco, P ;
Jornet, N ;
Duch, MA ;
Weber, L ;
Ginjaume, M ;
Eudaldo, T ;
Jurado, D ;
Ruiz, A ;
Ribas, M .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (10) :2899-2911
[9]   Modelling an extreme water-lung interface using a single pencil beam algorithm and the Monte Carlo method [J].
Cranmer-Sargison, G ;
Beckham, WA ;
Popescu, IA .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (08) :1557-1567
[10]  
Dahlin H, 1983, Acta Radiol Oncol, V22, P397