Marine management - Towards an integrated implementation of the European Marine Strategy Framework and the Water Framework Directives

被引:360
作者
Borja, Angel [1 ]
Elliott, Mike [2 ]
Carstensen, Jacob [3 ]
Heiskanen, Anna-Stiina [4 ]
van de Bund, Wouter [5 ]
机构
[1] AZTI Tecnalia, Div Marine Res, Pasaia 20110, Spain
[2] Univ Hull, Inst Estuarine & Coastal Studies, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
[3] Natl Environm Res Inst, Dept Marine Ecol, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[4] Finnish Environm Inst SYKE, Ctr Marine Res, FI-00251 Helsinki, Finland
[5] Inst Environm & Sustainabil, EC Joint Res Ctr, I-21020 Ispra, Italy
基金
欧盟第七框架计划;
关键词
Marine management; Ecosystem-based approach; Water Framework Directive; Marine Strategy Framework Directive; Monitoring and assessment; Reference conditions; ECOLOGICAL STATUS; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; TRANSITIONAL WATERS; COASTAL SYSTEMS; QUALITY STATUS; EUTROPHICATION; INDICATORS; ESTUARINE; SUPPORT; SEA;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.09.026
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Through implementing environmental Directives, Europe has moved towards coordinated and integrated catchment-to-coast management, following the most novel legislation on ecosystem-based approaches worldwide. The novel joint synthesis of this direction reviewed here allows us to regard the Water Framework Directive (WFD) as a 'deconstructing structural approach' whereas the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) is a 'holistic functional approach', i.e. the WFD has split the ecosystem into several biological quality elements, then it compares the structure of these (such as species complement) individually before combining them and attempting to determine the overall condition. In contrast the MSFD concentrates on the set of 11 descriptors which together summarize the way in which the whole system functions. We emphasize that both Directives are frameworks on which many other directives are linked but that they need to be fully and seamlessly integrated to give a land to open sea system of assessment and management. Hence, by taking account of the experience gained in the WFD implementation, together with that from regional sea conventions, such as OSPAR (North East Atlantic) or HELCOM (Baltic Sea), we propose in this contribution an integrative approach for the environmental status assessment, within the MSFD. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2175 / 2186
页数:12
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   A simple method for confidence rating of eutrophication status classifications [J].
Andersen, Jesper H. ;
Murray, Ciaran ;
Kaartokallio, Hermanni ;
Axe, Philip ;
Molvaer, Jarle .
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2010, 60 (06) :919-924
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Official Journal of the European Communities, VL332, P20
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Balt. Sea Environ. Proc
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Baltic Sea Environmental Proceedings
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Environment Monographs n83, OECD Core Set of Indicators for Environmental Performance Reviews, P39
[6]   European Environmental Management: Moving to an Ecosystem Approach [J].
Apitz, Sabine E. ;
Elliott, Michael ;
Fountain, Michelle ;
Galloway, Tamara S. .
INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 2 (01) :80-85
[7]  
Atkins J.P., MARINE POLLUTI UNPUB
[8]   The use of environmental integrative indicators to assess seabed disturbance in estuaries and coasts: Application to the Humber Estuary, UK [J].
Aubry, A ;
Elliott, M .
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2006, 53 (1-4) :175-185
[9]   HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan - A regional programme of measures for the marine environment based on the Ecosystem Approach [J].
Backer, Hermanni ;
Leppanen, Juha-Markku ;
Brusendorff, Anne Christine ;
Forsius, Kaj ;
Stankiewicz, Monika ;
Mehtonen, Jukka ;
Pyhala, Minna ;
Laamanen, Maria ;
Paulomaki, Hanna ;
Vlasov, Nikolay ;
Haaranen, Tarja .
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2010, 60 (05) :642-649
[10]   Marine ecosystem approaches to management: challenges and lessons in the United States [J].
Barnes, Cassandra ;
McFadden, Katherine W. .
MARINE POLICY, 2008, 32 (03) :387-392