Influences of species, latitudes and methodologies on estimates of phenological response to global warming

被引:947
作者
Parmesan, Camille [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Sect Integrat Biol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
animal; climate change; global warming; insect-plant interactions; latitude; meta-analysis; phenology; plant; temperature; trophic interactions; FLYCATCHER FICEDULA-HYPOLEUCA; MOTH OPEROPHTERA-BRUMATA; CLIMATE-CHANGE IMPACTS; UNITED-STATES; BUTTERFLY METAPOPULATION; EVOLUTIONARY RESPONSES; EUPHYDRYAS-EDITHA; ARRIVAL DATE; TRENDS; PRECIPITATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01404.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
New analyses are presented addressing the global impacts of recent climate change on phenology of plant and animal species. A meta-analysis spanning 203 species was conducted on published datasets from the northern hemisphere. Phenological response was examined with respect to two factors: distribution of species across latitudes and taxonomic affiliation or functional grouping of target species. Amphibians had a significantly stronger shift toward earlier breeding than all other taxonomic/functional groups, advancing more than twice as fast as trees, birds and butterflies. In turn, butterfly emergence or migratory arrival showed three times stronger advancement than the first flowering of herbs, perhaps portending increasing asynchrony in insect-plant interactions. Response was significantly stronger at higher latitudes where warming has been stronger, but latitude explained < 4% of the variation. Despite expectation, latitude was not yet an important predictor of climate change impacts on phenology. The only two previously published estimates of the magnitude of global response are quite different: 2.3 and 5.1 days decade(-1) advancement. The scientific community has assumed this difference to be real and has attempted to explain it in terms of biologically relevant phenomena: specifically, differences in distribution of data across latitudes, taxa or time periods. Here, these and other possibilities are explored. All analyses indicate that the difference in estimated response is primarily due to differences between the studies in criteria for incorporating data. It is a clear and automatic consequence of the exclusion by one study of data on 'stable' (nonresponsive) species. Once this is accounted for, the two studies support each other, generating similar conclusions despite analyzing substantially nonoverlapping datasets. Analyses here on a new expanded dataset estimate an overall spring advancement across the northern hemisphere of 2.8 days decade(-1). This is the first quantitative analysis showing that data-sampling methodologies significantly impact global (synthetic) estimates of magnitude of global warming response.
引用
收藏
页码:1860 / 1872
页数:13
相关论文
共 70 条
[11]   Bayesian analysis of climate change impacts in phenology [J].
Dose, V ;
Menzel, A .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2004, 10 (02) :259-272
[12]  
Downing TE, 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE 2001: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P105
[13]   Climate change has affected the breeding date of tree swallows throughout North America [J].
Dunn, PO ;
Winkler, DW .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 266 (1437) :2487-2490
[14]   Climate extremes: Observations, modeling, and impacts [J].
Easterling, DR ;
Meehl, GA ;
Parmesan, C ;
Changnon, SA ;
Karl, TR ;
Mearns, LO .
SCIENCE, 2000, 289 (5487) :2068-2074
[15]  
Easterling DR, 2000, B AM METEOROL SOC, V81, P417, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<0417:OVATIE>2.3.CO
[16]  
2
[17]   EXTINCTION, REDUCTION, STABILITY AND INCREASE - THE RESPONSES OF CHECKERSPOT BUTTERFLY (EUPHYDRYAS) POPULATIONS TO THE CALIFORNIA DROUGHT [J].
EHRLICH, PR ;
MURPHY, DD ;
SINGER, MC ;
SHERWOOD, CB ;
WHITE, RR ;
BROWN, IL .
OECOLOGIA, 1980, 46 (01) :101-105
[19]   Climate change and trophic interactions [J].
Harrington, R ;
Woiwod, I ;
Sparks, T .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1999, 14 (04) :146-150
[20]   The effect of an environmental change on mobile butterfly larvae and the nutritional quality of their hosts [J].
Hellmann, JJ .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2002, 71 (06) :925-936