Morphometric analysis of trabecular bone thickness using different algorithms

被引:6
作者
Darabi, A. [1 ]
Chandelier, F. [1 ]
Baroud, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Genie Mecan, Biomech Lab, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING-REVUE CANADIENNE DE GENIE ELECTRIQUE ET INFORMATIQUE | 2007年 / 32卷 / 03期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
bone microstructural assessment; distance transform; fuzzy distance transform; MRI; mu-CT; trabecular bone thickness;
D O I
10.1109/CJECE.2007.4413127
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 [计算机科学与技术];
摘要
Investigations have been carried out with the goal of assessing the trabecular bone thickness of biological samples using images obtained by micro-computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. There is no conventional definition of trabecular bone thickness, and many methods may be involved in determining it. However, the results of the available algorithms or software packages differ considerably from each other. This paper determines trabecular bone thickness on the basis of several algorithms. A deep understanding of the performance of different methods is achieved by studying pseudo-three-dimensional images of both geometrical models of well-defined thickness and real bone samples with different bone densities. The models facilitate comparisons between the algorithms or software packages. Comparison of the results obtained from these commercial software packages and other state-of-the-art algorithms shows that the thickness, spatial distribution, and shape of an object affect each result differently, but in a significant manner. This is primarily due to variations in the thresholding algorithms used to distinguish object area elements (pixels/voxels) from the background, or non-object, region. Additionally, the results show that the average difference in thickness measurements can vary by up to 102.34% for models and 46.49% for real bone samples. This data shows that the differences in measurements of the trabecular bone thickness due simply to the algorithm involved are remarkable. Therefore, biomedical engineers and scientists should he careful to select the algorithm that is most compatible with their specific application.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 163
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
Ex vivo assessment of trabecular bone structure from three-dimensional projection reconstruction MR micro-images [J].
Accardo, A ;
Candido, G ;
Jellús, V ;
Toffanin, R ;
Vittur, F .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 50 (08) :967-977
[2]
BORGEFORS G, 2002, P 16 IEEE INT C PATT, V1, P180
[3]
Fast Euclidean distance transformation by propagation using multiple neighborhoods [J].
Cuisenaire, O ;
Macq, B .
COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING, 1999, 76 (02) :163-172
[4]
DARABI A, 2007, UNPUB COMPUTER VISIO
[5]
Topological analysis of trabecular bone MR images [J].
Gomberg, BR ;
Saha, PK ;
Song, HK ;
Hwang, SN ;
Wehrli, FW .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2000, 19 (03) :166-174
[6]
Gregory J S, 1999, IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed, V3, P289, DOI 10.1109/4233.809173
[7]
A new method for the model-independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images [J].
Hildebrand, T ;
Ruegsegger, P .
JOURNAL OF MICROSCOPY-OXFORD, 1997, 185 :67-75
[8]
A new approach to the development of assessment guidelines for osteoporosis [J].
Kanis, JA ;
Black, D ;
Cooper, C ;
Dargent, P ;
Dawson-Hughes, B ;
De Laet, C ;
Delmas, P ;
Eisman, J ;
Johnell, O ;
Jonsson, B ;
Melton, L ;
Oden, A ;
Papapoulos, S ;
Pols, H ;
Rizzoli, R ;
Silman, A ;
Tenenhouse, A .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 13 (07) :527-536
[9]
Three-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA): a method for reconstruction of human bones using a dual X-ray absorptiometry device [J].
Kolta, S ;
Le Bras, A ;
Mitton, D ;
Bousson, V ;
de Guise, JA ;
Fechtenbaum, J ;
Laredo, JD ;
Roux, C ;
Skalli, W .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 16 (08) :969-976
[10]
Effects of mechanical stress/strain and estrogen on cancellous bone structure predicted by fuzzy decision [J].
Luo, ZP ;
Zhang, L ;
Turner, RT ;
An, KN .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2000, 47 (03) :344-351