In vitro measurement of kidney size: Comparison of ultrasonography and MRI

被引:82
作者
Bakker, J
Olree, M
Kaatee, R
de Lange, EE
Beek, FJA
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht Hosp, Dept Radiol, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Virginia, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiol, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
关键词
volume measurement; kidney volume and length; voxel-count; ellipsoid formula; ultrasonography; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-5629(97)00212-3
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
In this in vitro study, the accuracy and repeatability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) in assessing renal length and volume were determined, US and MR images of 20 cadaver pig kidneys were obtained twice and evaluated by two observers for each modality, The fluid displacement method provided the "gold standard." Renal volumes were calculated from the US and MR images using the ellipsoid formula. Additional volume calculations after segmentation of the kidney on MR images were done using the voxel-count method. Volumes calculated with the ellipsoid formula resulted in an average of 24% underestimation (range 5%-48%) of the renal volume for both US and MRT, With the voxel-count method, no significant deviation from the true renal volume was encountered. Repeatability was also greatest with the voxel-count method. Measuring renal length, repeatability was, again, better with MRI compared to US. For reliable calculation of renal size in vitro, MRI with use of the voxel-count method is preferred. (C) 1998 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.
引用
收藏
页码:683 / 688
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] HOW RELIABLE ARE ULTRASOUND MEASUREMENTS OF RENAL LENGTH IN ADULTS
    ABLETT, MJ
    COULTHARD, A
    LEE, REJ
    RICHARDSON, DL
    BELLAS, T
    OWEN, JP
    KEIR, MJ
    BUTLER, TJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1995, 68 (814) : 1087 - 1089
  • [2] CHANGES IN TRANSPLANTED KIDNEY VOLUME MEASURED BY ULTRASOUND
    ABSY, M
    METREWELI, C
    MATTHEWS, C
    ALKHADER, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1987, 60 (714) : 525 - 529
  • [3] BARTRUM R J JR, 1974, Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, V2, P281, DOI 10.1002/jcu.1870020404
  • [4] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [5] MRI SEGMENTATION - METHODS AND APPLICATIONS
    CLARKE, LP
    VELTHUIZEN, RP
    CAMACHO, MA
    HEINE, JJ
    VAIDYANATHAN, M
    HALL, LO
    THATCHER, RW
    SILBIGER, ML
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1995, 13 (03) : 343 - 368
  • [6] DEAN RH, 1981, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V116, P1408
  • [7] Edell SL, 1990, ATLAS ULTRASOUND MEA, P146
  • [8] EMAMIAN SA, 1995, ACTA RADIOL, V36, P399
  • [9] Lesion volume measurement in multiple sclerosis: How important is accurate repositioning
    GawneCain, ML
    Webb, S
    Tofts, P
    Miller, DH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1996, 6 (05) : 705 - 713
  • [10] IN-VITRO EVALUATION OF 3-DIMENSIONAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN VOLUME ESTIMATION OF ABDOMINAL ORGANS
    GILJA, OH
    THUNE, N
    MATRE, K
    HAUSKEN, T
    ODEGAARD, S
    BERSTAD, A
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 20 (02) : 157 - 165