Governance, organizational capabilities, and restructuring in transition economies

被引:101
作者
Filatotchev, I [1 ]
Wright, M
Uhlenbruck, K
Tihanyi, L
Hoskisson, RE
机构
[1] Univ Bradford, Sch Management, Bradford BD7 1DP, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Business, Ctr Management Buyout Res, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Management, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[4] Univ Oklahoma, Michael F Price Coll Business, Norman, OK 73019 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jwb.2003.08.019
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper focuses on the links between governance, firm capabilities and restructuring following the large-scale privatization process in Central and Eastern European transition economies using an integrative approach. Restructuring in these countries has been motivated by political and institutional changes and less so by market forces. Accordingly, political processes have produced political solutions such as "give-away" privatizations to insiders. These privatizations, in contrast to divestitures to outside owners, have realized less substantive restructuring because non-market incentives, such as too much managerial equity ownership, have created managerial entrenchment. In addition, we propose a connection between governance and organizational learning suggesting that learning is inhibited by excessive managerial ownership and lack of board knowledge regarding its oversight function. Furthermore, this entrenchment and poor board functioning may be perpetuated in financial-industrial groups, which have emerged as substitutes for market intermediaries in emerging economies. Thus, we propose that outside ownership involvement and the development of organizational capabilities may facilitate restructuring in the Central and Eastern European context. Our theoretical arguments are supported by case study evidence from transition economies. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 347
页数:17
相关论文
共 87 条
[11]  
CARLIN W, 1996, ECON TRANSIT, V4, P371
[12]   Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions [J].
Chang, SJ ;
Hong, J .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (03) :429-448
[13]   ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY - A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION [J].
COHEN, WM ;
LEVINTHAL, DA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) :128-152
[14]   Explaining the variance in the performance effects of privatization [J].
Cuervo, A ;
Villalonga, B .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2000, 25 (03) :581-590
[15]   Sources of CEO power and firm financial performance: A longitudinal assessment [J].
Daily, CM ;
Johnson, JL .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1997, 23 (02) :97-117
[16]   Enterprise restructuring in transition: A quantitative survey [J].
Djankov, S ;
Murrell, P .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2002, 40 (03) :739-792
[17]  
Estrin S, 1999, J COMP ECON, V27, P398, DOI 10.1006/jcec.1999.1603
[18]  
*EUR BANK REC DEV, 1998, TRANS REP ENT PERF G
[19]  
FILATCHEV I, 1999, ECON TRANSIT, V7, P487
[20]   Downsizing in privatized firms in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus [J].
Filatotchev, I ;
Buck, T ;
Zhukov, V .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (03) :286-304