Towards the real green revolution? Exploring the conceptual dimensions of a new ecological modernisation of agriculture that could 'feed the world'

被引:279
作者
Horlings, L. G. [1 ]
Marsden, T. K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Rural Sociol Grp, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Cardiff Univ, Sustainable Pl Res Inst, Cardiff CF10 3WA, S Glam, Wales
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2011年 / 21卷 / 02期
关键词
Ecological modernisation; Food production; Sustainability; Agro-ecology; Eco-economy; Food regime; RURAL-DEVELOPMENT; MULTIFUNCTIONAL AGRICULTURE; ORGANIC AGRICULTURE; MOVEMENT; IMPACT; SUSTAINABILITY; ENVIRONMENT; ECONOMY; SYSTEMS; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The challenge to produce enough food is more urgent than ever. We argue that the dominant food regime has responded to this challenge by a 'narrow' ecological modernisation process within agriculture which may decrease environmental effects to a certain extent, but also causes new negative side-effects and exposes some important missing links. In this paper we explore what might be a 'real' ecological modernisation process, including social, cultural, spatial and political aspects. The central question concerns: is there evidence in practice that agro-ecological approaches can contribute to the future demand for food production, especially in developing countries? We illustrate this by describing examples from Africa, Brazil and China, showing a rich variety of such approaches in agricultural practices. Our conclusion is that agro-ecological approaches could significantly contribute to 'feeding the world', and thereby contribute to a 'real green revolution'; but that this requires a more radical move towards a new type of regionally embedded agri-food eco-economy. This is one which includes rethinking market mechanisms and organisations, an altered institutional context, and is interwoven with active farmers and consumers' participation. It also requires a re-direction of science investments to take account of translating often isolated cases of good practice into mainstream agri-food movements. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 452
页数:12
相关论文
共 121 条
[71]  
Goodman D., 1987, FARMING BIOTECHNOLOG
[72]  
Hajer M.A., 1996, The politics of environmental discourse
[73]   The Contested Redefinition of a Sustainable Countryside: Revisiting Frouws' Rurality Discourses [J].
Hermans, Frans ;
Horlings, Ina ;
Beers, P. J. ;
Mommaas, Hans .
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2010, 50 (01) :46-63
[74]  
Horlings L., 2010, Networking the Rural: The Future of Green Regions in Europe, P213
[75]  
Huber J., 1982, VERLORENE UNSCHULD O
[76]  
Huber J., 1985, Die Regenbogengesellschaft. Okologie und Sozialpolitik
[77]  
International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD), 2009, GLOB REP
[78]   Natural systems agriculture: a truly radical alternative [J].
Jackson, W .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 88 (02) :111-117
[79]  
Janicke Martin, 1984, Umweltpolitische Pravention als okologische Modernisierung und Strukturpolitik
[80]   Creating Sustainable Rural Development through Stimulating the Eco-economy: Beyond the Eco-economic Paradox? [J].
Kitchen, Lawrence ;
Marsden, Terry .
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2009, 49 (03) :273-294