T1ρ imaging of murine brain tumors at 4 T

被引:38
作者
Poptani, H
Duvvuri, U
Miller, CG
Mancuso, A
Charagundla, S
Fraser, NW
Glickson, JD
Leigh, JS
Reddy, R
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Microbiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
brain neoplasms; MR; magnetic resonance (MR); experimental; high-field-strength; imaging; pulse sequences;
D O I
10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80742-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. The goal of this study was to evaluate the utility of T1(p) weighting in magnetic resonance imaging of murine brain tumors. Materials and Methods. S91 Cloudman melanoma was implanted in mouse brains (n = 4). A T2-weighted spin-echo (SE) and a T1(p)-weighted fast SE-based sequence were performed on a 4-T clinical imager. T2 and T1(p) maps were computed. The tumor-to-normal-tissue contrast was compared between T2-weighted, T1(p)-weighted, proton-density-weighted, and pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted SE images. Results. The tumor-tissue contrast of the T1(p)-weighted images was similar to that of the T2-weighted images but less than that of the postcontrast T1-weighted images, The T1(p)-weighted images provided better definition of tumor boundaries than T2-weighted images. At spin-locking powers of 0.5 and 1.5 kHz, the T1(p) of the tumor was 64.0 msec +/- 0.46 and 68.65 msec +/- 0.59. respectively. There was no significant inter- or intra-animal variation in Tip for tumor or normal brain cortex. Conclusion. T1(p)-weighted imaging performed at low spin-lock strengths qualitatively depicted tumor borders better than proton-density or T2-weighted imaging and could be useful in treatment planning when combined with other imaging sequences.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 47
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   WATER IN AGAROSE GELS STUDIED BY NUCLEAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE RELAXATION IN ROTATING FRAME [J].
ANDRASKO, J .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1975, 15 (12) :1235-1243
[2]   3D spin-lock imaging of human gliomas [J].
Aronen, HJ ;
Ramadan, UA ;
Peltonen, TK ;
Markkola, AT ;
Tanttu, JI ;
Jääskeläinen, J ;
Häkkinen, AM ;
Sepponen, R .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1999, 17 (07) :1001-1010
[3]  
Bomsdorf H, 1988, NMR Biomed, V1, P151, DOI 10.1002/nbm.1940010308
[4]  
CHARAGUNDLA SR, 2000, THESIS U PENNSYLVANI
[5]   SAR and B1 field distributions in a heterogeneous human head model within a birdcage coil [J].
Collins, CM ;
Li, SZ ;
Smith, MB .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1998, 40 (06) :847-856
[6]   MR imaging contrast in human brain tissue: Assessment and optimization at 4 T [J].
Duewell, S ;
Wolff, SD ;
Wen, H ;
Balaban, RS ;
Jezzard, P .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 199 (03) :780-786
[7]  
Duvvuri U, 1999, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V10, P527, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199910)10:4<527::AID-JMRI5>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-0
[9]   T-1 rho relaxation and its application to MR histology [J].
Engelhardt, RT ;
Johnson, GA .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1996, 35 (05) :781-786
[10]  
Gröhn OHJ, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V42, P268, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199908)42:2<268::AID-MRM8>3.0.CO