Comparison of measured and Monte Carlo calculated dose distributions in inhomogeneous phantoms in clinical electron beams

被引:33
作者
Doucet, R
Olivares, M
DeBlois, F
Podgorsak, EB
Kawrakow, I
Seuntjens, J
机构
[1] Natl Res Council Canada, Ionizing Radiat Stand Grp, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Montreal Gen Hosp, Med Phys Unit, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/48/15/307
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Calculations of dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms in clinical electron beams, carried out using the fast voxel Monte Carlo (MC) system XVMC and the conventional MC code EGSnrc, were compared with measurements. Irradiations were performed using the 9 MeV and 15 MeV beams from a Varian Clinac-18 accelerator with a 10 x 10 cm(2) applicator and an SSD of 100 cm. Depth doses were measured with thermoluminescent dosimetry techniques (TLD 700) in phantoms consisting of slabs of Solid Water(TM) (SW) and bone and slabs of SW and lung tissue-equivalent materials. Lateral profiles in water were measured using an electron diode at different depths behind one and two immersed aluminium rods. The accelerator was modelled using the EGS4/BEAM system and optimized phase-space files were used as input to the EGSnrc and the XVMC calculations. Also, for the XVMC, an experiment-based beam model was used. All measurements were corrected by the EGSnrc-calculated stopping power ratios. Overall, there is excellent agreement between the corrected experimental and the two MC dose distributions. Small remaining discrepancies may be due to the non-equivalence between physical and simulated tissue-equivalent materials and to detector fluence perturbation effect correction factors that were calculated for the 9 MeV beam at selected depths in the heterogeneous phantoms.
引用
收藏
页码:2339 / 2354
页数:16
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams [J].
Almond, PR ;
Biggs, PJ ;
Coursey, BM ;
Hanson, WF ;
Huq, MS ;
Nath, R ;
Rogers, DWO .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (09) :1847-1870
[2]  
Andreo P, 2000, TECHNICAL REPORT SER, V398
[3]   R(50) as a beam quality specifier for selecting stopping-power ratios and reference depths for electron dosimetry [J].
Burns, DT ;
Ding, GX ;
Rogers, DWO .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (03) :383-388
[4]  
Cygler J, 2002, MED PHYS, V29, P1351
[5]   Evaluation of a commercial three-dimensional electron beam treatment planning system [J].
Ding, GX ;
Cygler, JE ;
Zhang, GG ;
Yu, MK .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (12) :2571-2580
[6]   EVALUATION OF FILM AND THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY OF HIGH-ENERGY ELECTRON-BEAMS IN HETEROGENEOUS PHANTOMS [J].
ELKHATIB, E ;
ANTOLAK, J ;
SCRIMGER, J .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (02) :317-323
[7]   Fast Monte Carlo dose calculation for photon beams based on the VMC electron algorithm [J].
Fippel, M .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (08) :1466-1475
[8]   Investigation of variance reduction techniques for Monte Carlo photon dose calculation using XVMC [J].
Kawrakow, I ;
Fippel, M .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (08) :2163-2183
[9]   Accurate condensed history Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport. I. EGSnrc, the new EGS4 version [J].
Kawrakow, I .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (03) :485-498
[10]   3D electron dose calculation using a Voxel based Monte Carlo algorithm (VMC) [J].
Kawrakow, I ;
Fippel, M ;
Friedrich, K .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (04) :445-457