Effects of inhibitory feedback in a network model of avian brain stem

被引:29
作者
Dasika, VK
White, JA
Carney, LH
Colburn, HS
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Hearing Res Ctr, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Ctr BioDynam, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Syracuse Univ, Inst Sensory Res, Dept Biomed & Chem Engn, Syracuse, NY USA
[5] Syracuse Univ, Inst Sensory Res, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Syracuse, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1152/jn.01065.2004
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The avian auditory brain stem consists of a network of specialized nuclei, including nucleus laminaris (NL) and superior olivary nucleus (SON). NL cells show sensitivity to interaural time difference (ITD), a critical cue that underlies spatial hearing. SON cells provide inhibitory feedback to the rest of the network. Empirical data suggest that feedback inhibition from SON could increase the ITD sensitivity of NL across sound level. Using a bilateral network model, we assess the effects of SON feedback inhibition. Individual cells are specified as modified leaky-integrate-and-fire neurons with time constants and thresholds that vary with inhibitory input. Acoustic sound level is reflected in the discharge rates of the model auditory-nerve fibers, which innervate the network. Simulations show that with SON inhibitory feedback, ITD sensitivity is maintained in model NL cells over a threefold range in auditory-nerve discharge rate. In contrast, without SON feedback inhibition, ITD sensitivity is significantly reduced as input rates are increased. Feedback inhibition is most beneficial in maintaining ITD sensitivity at high-input rates (simulating high sound levels). With SON inhibition, ITD sensitivity is maintained for both interaurally balanced inputs (simulating an on-center sound source) and interaurally imbalanced inputs (simulating a lateralized source). Further, the empirically observed temporal build-up of SON inhibition and the presence of reciprocal inhibitory connections between the ipsi- and contralateral SON both improve ITD sensitivity. In sum, our network model shows that inhibitory feedback can substantially increase the sensitivity and dynamic range of ITD coding in the avian auditory brain stem.
引用
收藏
页码:400 / 414
页数:15
相关论文
共 45 条
[11]   The role of GABAergic inputs for coincidence detection in the neurones of nucleus laminaris of the chick [J].
Funabiki, K ;
Koyano, K ;
Ohmori, H .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1998, 508 (03) :851-869
[12]   RESPONSE OF BINAURAL NEURONS OF DOG SUPERIOR OLIVARY COMPLEX TO DICHOTIC TONAL STIMULI - SOME PHYSIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF SOUND LOCALIZATION [J].
GOLDBERG, JM ;
BROWN, PB .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1969, 32 (04) :613-&
[13]   Modeling coincidence detection in nucleus laminaris [J].
Grau-Serrat, V ;
Carr, CE ;
Simon, JZ .
BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 2003, 89 (05) :388-396
[14]   SYNAPTIC INHIBITION INFLUENCES THE TEMPORAL CODING PROPERTIES OF MEDIAL SUPERIOR OLIVARY NEURONS - AN IN-VITRO STUDY [J].
GROTHE, B ;
SANES, DH .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1994, 14 (03) :1701-1709
[15]   New roles for synaptic inhibition in sound localization [J].
Grothe, B .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 4 (07) :540-550
[16]   A DEPOLARIZING INHIBITORY RESPONSE TO GABA IN BRAIN-STEM AUDITORY NEURONS OF THE CHICK [J].
HYSON, RL ;
REYES, AD ;
RUBEL, EW .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1995, 677 (01) :117-126
[17]   COCHLEAR MICROPHONIC MEASUREMENTS OF INTERAURAL TIME DIFFERENCES IN THE CHICK [J].
HYSON, RL ;
OVERHOLT, EM ;
LIPPE, WR .
HEARING RESEARCH, 1994, 81 (1-2) :109-118
[18]   A PLACE THEORY OF SOUND LOCALIZATION [J].
JEFFRESS, LA .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1948, 41 (01) :35-39
[19]   ENHANCEMENT OF NEURAL SYNCHRONIZATION IN THE ANTEROVENTRAL COCHLEAR NUCLEUS .1. RESPONSES TO TONES AT THE CHARACTERISTIC FREQUENCY [J].
JORIS, PX ;
CARNEY, LH ;
SMITH, PH ;
YIN, TCT .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 71 (03) :1022-1036
[20]   Evaluation of the limiting acuity of coincidence detection in nucleus laminaris of the chicken [J].
Kuba, H ;
Yamada, R ;
Ohmori, H .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2003, 552 (02) :611-620