A comparison of 2 influenza vaccine schedules in 6-to 23-month-old children

被引:82
作者
Englund, JA
Walter, EB
Fairchok, MP
Monto, AS
Neuzil, KM
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp & Reg Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Div Pediat Infect Dis Allergy & Rheumatol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Madigan Army Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Tacoma, WA 98431 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Allergy & Infect Dis, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
inactivated influenza vaccine; children;
D O I
10.1542/peds.2004-2373
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background. Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) is recommended for all children ages 6 to 23 months. Delivering 2 doses of TIV at least 4 weeks apart to young children receiving this vaccine for the first time is challenging. Methods. We compared the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the standard 2-dose regimen of TIV administered in the fall with an early schedule of a single spring dose followed by a fall dose of the same vaccine in healthy toddlers 6 to 23 months of age. Children were recruited in the spring to be randomized into either the standard or early schedule. An additional group was also enrolled in the fall as part of a nonrandomized standard comparison group. The 2002-2003 licensed TIV was administered in the spring; the fall 2003-2004 vaccine contained the same 3 antigenic components. Reactogenicity was assessed by parental diaries and telephone surveillance. Blood was obtained after the second dose of TIV for all children. The primary outcome measure was antibody response to influenza A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B after 2 doses of vaccine, as determined by hemagglutination-inhibition titers >= 1: 32 and geometric mean titer (GMT). Results. Two hundred nineteen children were randomized to receive either the standard or early TIV schedule; 40 additional children were enrolled in the fall in the nonrandomized standard group. Response rates in the combined standard versus early groups were similar overall: 78% (GMT: 48) vs 76% (GMT: 57) to H1N1, 89% (GMT: 115) vs 88% (GMT: 129) to H3N2, and 52% (GMT: 24) vs 60% (GMT: 28) to B. Reactogenicity after TIV in both groups of children was minimal and did not differ by dose, age, or time between doses. Reaction rates were higher in those receiving TIV and concomitant vaccines compared with those receiving TIV alone. Overall rates of fever >38 degrees C axillary and injection-site pain, redness, or swelling were 5.4%, 3.1%, 0.9%, and 1.1%, respectively. Conclusions. When the spring and fall influenza vaccines had the same 3 antigenic components, the early vaccine schedule resulted in similar immunogenicity and reactogenicity compared with the standard schedule. When the vaccine components do not change between years, initiating influenza vaccine in the spring at the time of routine office visits would facilitate full immunization of children against influenza earlier in the season.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1047
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   Effectiveness of inactivated influenza vaccine in preventing acute otitis media in young children - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Hoberman, A ;
Greenberg, DP ;
Paradise, JL ;
Rockette, HE ;
Lave, JR ;
Kearney, DH ;
Colborn, DK ;
Kurs-Lasky, M ;
Haralam, MA ;
Byers, CJ ;
Zoffel, LM ;
Fabian, IA ;
Bernard, BS ;
Kerr, JD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (12) :1608-1616
[12]   ROLE OF SERUM HEMAGGLUTINATION-INHIBITING ANTIBODY IN PROTECTION AGAINST CHALLENGE INFECTION WITH INFLUENZA A2 AND B VIRUSES [J].
HOBSON, D ;
CURRY, RL ;
BEARE, AS ;
WARDGARD.A .
JOURNAL OF HYGIENE, 1972, 70 (04) :767-777
[13]   The feasibility of universal influenza vaccination for infants and toddlers [J].
Humiston, SG ;
Szilagyi, PG ;
Iwane, MK ;
Schaffer, SJ ;
Santoli, J ;
Shone, L ;
Barth, R ;
McInerny, T ;
Schwartz, B .
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 2004, 158 (09) :867-874
[14]   Studies of the 1996-1997 inactivated influenza vaccine among children attending day care: Immunologic response, protection against infection, anti clinical effectiveness [J].
Hurwitz, ES ;
Haber, M ;
Chang, A ;
Shope, T ;
Teo, ST ;
Giesick, JS ;
Ginsberg, MM ;
Cox, NJ .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2000, 182 (04) :1218-1221
[15]   Comparison of immunogenicity and tolerability of a virosome-adjuvanted and a split influenza vaccine in children [J].
Kanra, G ;
Marchisio, P ;
Feiterna-Sperling, C ;
Gaedicke, G ;
Lazar, H ;
Durrer, P ;
Kürsteiner, O ;
Herzog, C ;
Kara, A ;
Principi, N .
PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2004, 23 (04) :300-306
[16]  
Harper Scott A., 2004, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V53, P1
[17]  
Neuzil Kathleen M, 2002, Semin Pediatr Infect Dis, V13, P174, DOI 10.1053/spid.2002.125860
[18]   The effect of influenza on hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and courses of antibiotics in children. [J].
Neuzil, KM ;
Mellen, BG ;
Wright, PF ;
Mitchel, EF ;
Griffin, MR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (04) :225-231
[19]   The burden of influenza illness in children with asthma and other chronic medical conditions [J].
Neuzil, KM ;
Wright, PF ;
Mitchel, EF ;
Griffin, MR .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2000, 137 (06) :856-864
[20]   Burden of interpandemic influenza in children younger than 5 years: A 25-year prospective study [J].
Neuzil, KM ;
Zhu, YW ;
Griffin, MR ;
Edwards, KM ;
Thompson, JM ;
Tollefson, SJ ;
Wright, PF .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 185 (02) :147-152