Motivation and neuropsychological test performance following mild head injury

被引:27
作者
Binder, LM
Kelly, MP
Villanueva, MR
Winslow, MM
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] So Oregon Neuropsychol Clin LLC, Medford, OR USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1076/jcen.25.3.420.13806
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Effect of motivation on neuropsychological test performance in mild head injury was assessed. Motivation was measured using the Portland Digit Recognition Test. Three groups were compared: (a) mild head injury, financial incentives, good motivation; (b) mild head injury, financial incentives, poor motivation; (c) moderate/severe head injury, good motivation. The neuropsychological battery included measures of sensory function, motor function, attention, intelligence, abstract reasoning, and memory. Mild head injury well motivated patients performed significantly better than the other two groups on some tests. Mild head injury poorly motivated individuals and moderate-severe head injury patients were indistinguishable on many tests. Consistent with previous reports, tactile sensory (finger recognition and Fingertip Number Writing Perception) and recognition memory (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning) tasks were identified as clinically useful measures of poor motivation. On these measures mild head injury well motivated examinees performed no better than moderate-severe patients, with both groups superior to mild head injury poorly motivated examinees. Sensitivity and specificity data are reported. Our measures of tactile sensation and verbal recognition memory were more affected by motivation than by the severity of head injury.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 430
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[11]   UNCOVERING MALINGERED AMNESIA [J].
BRANDT, J ;
RUBINSKY, E ;
LASSEN, G .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1985, 444 (MAY) :502-503
[12]  
Cohen J., 1998, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, V2nd
[13]   NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL OUTCOME AT 1-YEAR POST HEAD-INJURY [J].
DIKMEN, SS ;
MACHAMER, JE ;
WINN, HR ;
TEMKIN, NR .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 9 (01) :80-90
[14]   Practical guidelines in the use of symptom validity and other psychological tests to measure malingering and symptom exaggeration in traumatic brain injury cases [J].
Etcoff, LM ;
Kampfer, KM .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1996, 6 (04) :171-201
[15]  
Frederick R. I., 1991, Psychological Assessment, V3, P596, DOI [DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.3.4.596, https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.3.4.596]
[16]   Validation of a Detector of Response Bias on a Forced-Choice Test of Nonverbal Ability [J].
Frederick, Richard I. ;
Sarfaty, Stephen D. ;
Johnston, J. Dennis ;
Powel, Jeffrey .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 8 (01) :118-125
[17]  
Geffen Gina, 1990, Clin Neuropsychol, V4, P45, DOI 10.1080/13854049008401496
[18]  
GENTRY LR, 1988, AM J ROENTGENOL, V150, P663, DOI 10.2214/ajr.150.3.663
[19]   MMPI-2 VALIDITY SCALES VERSUS DOMAIN-SPECIFIC MEASURES IN DETECTION OF FACTITIOUS TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY [J].
GREIFFENSTEIN, MF ;
GOLA, T ;
BAKER, WJ .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 1995, 9 (03) :230-240
[20]  
GREIFFENSTEIN MF, 1994, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT, V8, P218