Motivation and neuropsychological test performance following mild head injury

被引:27
作者
Binder, LM
Kelly, MP
Villanueva, MR
Winslow, MM
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] So Oregon Neuropsychol Clin LLC, Medford, OR USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1076/jcen.25.3.420.13806
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Effect of motivation on neuropsychological test performance in mild head injury was assessed. Motivation was measured using the Portland Digit Recognition Test. Three groups were compared: (a) mild head injury, financial incentives, good motivation; (b) mild head injury, financial incentives, poor motivation; (c) moderate/severe head injury, good motivation. The neuropsychological battery included measures of sensory function, motor function, attention, intelligence, abstract reasoning, and memory. Mild head injury well motivated patients performed significantly better than the other two groups on some tests. Mild head injury poorly motivated individuals and moderate-severe head injury patients were indistinguishable on many tests. Consistent with previous reports, tactile sensory (finger recognition and Fingertip Number Writing Perception) and recognition memory (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning) tasks were identified as clinically useful measures of poor motivation. On these measures mild head injury well motivated examinees performed no better than moderate-severe patients, with both groups superior to mild head injury poorly motivated examinees. Sensitivity and specificity data are reported. Our measures of tactile sensation and verbal recognition memory were more affected by motivation than by the severity of head injury.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 430
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[21]   MALINGERING DETECTION - THE USE OF A FORCED-CHOICE METHOD IN IDENTIFYING ORGANIC VERSUS SIMULATED MEMORY IMPAIRMENT [J].
GUILMETTE, TJ ;
HART, KJ ;
GIULIANO, AJ .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 1993, 7 (01) :59-69
[22]  
Heaton R.K., 1991, COMPREHENSIVE NORMS
[23]   PROSPECTS FOR FAKING BELIEVABLE DEFICITS ON NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING [J].
HEATON, RK ;
SMITH, HH ;
LEHMAN, RAW ;
VOGT, AT .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1978, 46 (05) :892-900
[24]   REFINING THE FORCED-CHOICE METHOD FOR THE DETECTION OF MALINGERING [J].
HISCOCK, M ;
HISCOCK, CK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 11 (06) :967-974
[25]  
Martín J, 2001, J TURBUL, V2, P1
[26]   EFFECTS OF SOPHISTICATION AND MOTIVATION ON THE DETECTION OF MALINGERED MEMORY PERFORMANCE USING A COMPUTERIZED FORCED-CHOICE TASK [J].
MARTIN, RC ;
BOLTER, JF ;
TODD, ME ;
GOUVIER, WD ;
NICCOLLS, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 15 (06) :867-880
[27]  
Millis S.R., 1992, CLIN NEUROPSYCHOL, V6, P406
[28]   The effects of two motivational manipulations on the neuropsychological performance of mildly head-injured college students [J].
Orey, SA ;
Cragar, DE ;
Berry, DTR .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 15 (04) :335-348
[29]   DIGIT MEMORY TEST - UNEQUIVOCAL CEREBRAL-DYSFUNCTION AND SUSPECTED MALINGERING [J].
PRIGATANO, GP ;
AMIN, K .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 15 (04) :537-546
[30]  
REITAN RM, 1985, HALSTEADREITAN NEURO