A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis

被引:2420
作者
Imai, Kosuke [1 ]
Keele, Luke [2 ]
Tingley, Dustin [3 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Polit, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Dept Govt, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
causal inference; causal mechanisms; direct and indirect effects; linear structural equation models; sensitivity analysis; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; MODERATED MEDIATION; JOBS INTERVENTION; IDENTIFICATION; MODELS; BIAS; PROPORTION; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1037/a0020761
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Traditionally in the social sciences, causal mediation analysis has been formulated, understood, and implemented within the framework of linear structural equation models. We argue and demonstrate that this is problematic for 3 reasons: the lack of a general definition of causal mediation effects independent of a particular statistical model, the inability to specify the key identification assumption, and the difficulty of extending the framework to nonlinear models. In this article, we propose an alternative approach that overcomes these limitations. Our approach is general because it offers the definition, identification, estimation, and sensitivity analysis of causal mediation effects without reference to any specific statistical model. Further, our approach explicitly links these 4 elements closely together within a single framework. As a result, the proposed framework can accommodate linear and nonlinear relationships, parametric and nonparametric models, continuous and discrete mediators, and various types of outcome variables. The general definition and identification result also allow us to develop sensitivity analysis in the context of commonly used models, which enables applied researchers to formally assess the robustness of their empirical conclusions to violations of the key assumption. We illustrate our approach by applying it to the Job Search Intervention Study. We also offer easy-to-use software that implements all our proposed methods.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 334
页数:26
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [21] Hastie T., 1990, Gam: Generalized Additive Models
  • [22] SAMPLE SELECTION BIAS AS A SPECIFICATION ERROR
    HECKMAN, JJ
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (01) : 153 - 161
  • [23] HOLLAND PW, 1986, J AM STAT ASSOC, V81, P945, DOI 10.2307/2289064
  • [24] Hyman H., 1955, Survey design and analysis: Principles, cases, and procedures
  • [25] Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects
    Imai, Kosuke
    Keele, Luke
    Yamamoto, Teppei
    [J]. STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 25 (01) : 51 - 71
  • [26] James L., 1982, Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data
  • [27] Causal Inference in Randomized Experiments With Mediational Processes
    Jo, Booil
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2008, 13 (04) : 314 - 336
  • [28] PROCESS ANALYSIS - ESTIMATING MEDIATION IN TREATMENT EVALUATIONS
    JUDD, CM
    KENNY, DA
    [J]. EVALUATION REVIEW, 1981, 5 (05) : 602 - 619
  • [29] The mediation proportion
    Kaufman, JS
    MacLehose, RF
    Kaufman, S
    Greenland, S
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 16 (05) : 710 - 710
  • [30] Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation
    King, G
    Tomz, M
    Wittenberg, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2000, 44 (02) : 347 - 361