Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector:: Image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration

被引:40
作者
Hamer, OW
Sirlin, CB
Strotzer, M
Borisch, I
Zorger, N
Feuerbach, S
Völk, M
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Regensburg, Dept Diagnost Radiol, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[3] Hosp Hohe Warte, Dept Radiol, Bayreuth, Germany
[4] Ulm Army Hosp, Dept Radiol, Ulm, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2372041738
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare image quality and estimated dose for chest radiographs obtained by using a cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector at fixed tube voltage and detector entrance dose with and without additional 0.3-mm copper filtration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. All prospectively enrolled patients signed the written consent form. Chest radiographs in two projections were acquired at 125-kVp tube voltage and 2.5-mu Gy detector entrance dose. The experimental group (38 patients) was imaged with 0.3-mm copper filtration; the control group (38 patients) was imaged without copper filtration. An additional 12 patients were imaged with and without copper filtration and served as paired subject-controls. Three readers blinded to group and clinical data independently evaluated the radiographs for image quality on a digital display system. Twelve variables (six for each radiographic projection) were assigned scores on a seven-point ordinal scale. Scores between experimental and control groups were compared: Logistic regression analysis and Mann-Whitney U test were used for unpaired patients; and Wilcoxon and McNemar test, for paired patients. In all, 72 comparisons were determined (36 [12 variables X three readers] for unpaired patients and 36 for paired patients). In a phantom study, radiation burden of experimental protocol was compared with that of control protocol by using Monte Carlo calculations. RESULTS: For 70 of 72 comparisons, digital radiographs obtained with copper filtration were of similar image quality as radiographs obtained without copper filtration (P =.123 to P >.99). For two of 72 comparisons, one observer judged the experimental protocol superior to the control protocol (P =.043, P =.046). Patient dose reduction estimated with Monte Carlo calculations was 31%. Use of copper filtration increased exposure times by 48% for posteroanterior views and by 34% for lateral views. CONCLUSION: Subjectively equivalent chest radiographic image quality was found with estimated 30% dose reduction after addition of 0.3-mm copper filtration with flat-panel cesium iodide-amorphous silicon technology. (c) RSNA, 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 700
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]
Dose efficiency and low-contrast detectability of an amorphous silicon x-ray detector for digital radiography [J].
Aufrichtig, R ;
Xue, P .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (09) :2653-2669
[2]
Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography [J].
Bacher, K ;
Smeets, P ;
De Hauwere, A ;
Verstraete, K ;
Thierens, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (04) :923-929
[3]
The impact of increased Al filtration on x-ray tube loading and image quality in diagnostic radiology [J].
Behrman, RH .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (01) :69-78
[4]
Effective dose in diagnostic radiology as a function of x-ray beam filtration for a constant exit dose and constant film density [J].
Behrman, RH ;
Yasuda, G .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (05) :780-790
[5]
DIGITAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHY WITH PHOTOSTIMULABLE STORAGE PHOSPHORS - SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO AS A FUNCTION OF KILOVOLTAGE WITH MATCHED EXPOSURE RISK [J].
CHOTAS, HG ;
FLOYD, CE ;
DOBBINS, JT ;
RAVIN, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 186 (02) :395-398
[6]
Principles of digital radiography with large-area, electronically readable detectors: A review of the basics [J].
Chotas, HG ;
Dobbins, JT ;
Ravin, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 210 (03) :595-599
[7]
Commission of the European Communities, 1996, EUR GUID QUAL CRIT D
[8]
DQE(F) OF 4 GENERATIONS OF COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY ACQUISITION DEVICES [J].
DOBBINS, JT ;
ERGUN, DL ;
RUTZ, L ;
HINSHAW, DA ;
BLUME, H ;
CLARK, DC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (10) :1581-1593
[9]
Chest radiography: Optimization of X-ray spectrum for cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector [J].
Dobbins, JT ;
Samei, E ;
Chotas, HG ;
Warp, RJ ;
Baydush, AH ;
Floyd, CE ;
Ravin, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 226 (01) :221-230
[10]
Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: Image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography [J].
Fink, C ;
Hallscheidt, PJ ;
Noeldge, G ;
Kampschulte, A ;
Radeleff, B ;
Hosch, WP ;
Kauffmann, GW ;
Hansmann, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (02) :481-486