Cost-effectiveness of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening use

被引:41
作者
Lairson, David R. [1 ]
Dicarlo, Melissa [2 ]
Myers, Ronald E. [2 ]
Wolf, Thomas [2 ]
Cocroft, James [2 ]
Sifri, Randa [3 ]
Rosenthal, Michael [3 ]
Vernon, Sally W. [4 ]
Wender, Richard [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Houston, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Management Policy & Community Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Family & Community Med, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[4] Univ Texas Houston, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Hlth Promot & Behav Sci, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
cost-effectiveness; colorectal cancer; screening promotion; economic evaluation;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.23232
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is cost-effective but underused. The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of targeted and tailored behavioral interventions to increase CRC screening use by conducting an economic analysis associated with a randomized trial among patients in a large, racially and ethnically diverse, urban family practice in Philadelphia. METHODS. The incremental costs per unit increase were measured in individuals who were screened during the 24 months after intervention. Percent increase in screening was adjusted for baseline differences in the study groups. Each intervention arm received a targeted screening invitation letter, stool blood test (SBT) cards, informational booklet, and reminder letter. Tailored interventions incrementally added tailored messages and reminder telephone calls. RESULTS, Program costs of the targeted intervention were $42 per participant. Additional costs of adding tailored print materials and of delivering a reminder telephone call were $150 and $200 per participant, respectively. The cost per additional individual screened was $319 when comparing the no intervention group with the targeted intervention group. CONCLUSIONS. The targeted intervention was more effective and less costly than the tailored intervention. Although tailoring plus reminder telephone call was the most effective strategy, it was very costly per additional individual screened. Mailed SBT cards significantly boosted CRC screening use. However, going beyond the targeted intervention to include tailoring or tailoring plus reminder calls in the manner used in this study did not appear to be an economically attractive strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 788
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[41]   Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review [J].
Vernon, SW .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (19) :1406-1422
[42]   Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: Clinical guidelines and rationale - Update based on new evidence [J].
Winawer, S ;
Fletcher, R ;
Rex, D ;
Bond, J ;
Burt, R ;
Ferrucci, J ;
Ganiats, T ;
Levin, T ;
Woolf, S ;
Johnson, D ;
Kirk, L ;
Litin, S ;
Simmang, C .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 124 (02) :544-560
[43]   SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL-CANCER WITH FECAL OCCULT BLOOD TESTING AND SIGMOIDOSCOPY [J].
WINAWER, SJ ;
FLEHINGER, BJ ;
SCHOTTENFELD, D ;
MILLER, DG .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (16) :1311-1318
[44]   A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. [J].
Winawer, SJ ;
Stewart, ET ;
Zauber, AG ;
Bond, JH ;
Ansel, H ;
Waye, JD ;
Hall, D ;
Hamlin, JA ;
Schapiro, M ;
O'Brien, MJ ;
Sternberg, SS ;
Gottlieb, LS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (24) :1766-1772
[45]   Costs and cost effectiveness of a health care provider-directed intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening among veterans [J].
Wolf, MS ;
Fitzner, KA ;
Powell, EF ;
McCaffrey, KR ;
Pickard, AS ;
McKoy, JM ;
Lindenberg, J ;
Schumock, GT ;
Carson, KR ;
Ferreira, MR ;
Dolan, NC ;
Bennett, CL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (34) :8877-8883