Public and private policy change:: Pension reform in four countries

被引:13
作者
Beland, Daniel [1 ]
Shinkawa, Toshimitsu
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[2] Kyoto Univ, Kyoto, Japan
关键词
pensions; social policy; policy change; institutions; privatization;
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00228.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article offers a comparative, qualitative analysis of the changing nature of - and relationship between - public and private old age pensions in the United States, Canada, Britain, and Japan. Stressing the impact of institutional legacies on policy change, the article explains why these countries have taken contrasting paths toward the restructuring of public and private pension policies. The study. finds that the four countries fall into two distinct clusters. On the one hand are Canada and the United States, which have essentially witnessed policy drift toward a greater reliance on private savings. On the other hand are Britain and Japan, which have reshaped their pension systems largely through legislative revision. The last section explains the differences between and within these two country clusters. The article concludes that institutional forces explain the distinctive policy patterns between the two country clusters but that it is necessary to bring in other factors (i.e., demographic aging, union density, and the role of ideas) to account for differences within each of these clusters.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 371
页数:23
相关论文
共 69 条
[21]  
Esping-Andersen G., 1984, Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, P179
[22]  
FAWCETT H, 2002, ANN M EUR CONS POL R
[23]  
Galenson Walter, 1996, AM LABOR MOVEMENT 19
[24]  
Glennerster Howard, 2000, British Social Policy since 1945, V2
[25]  
Hacker JacobS., 2002, The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States
[26]   Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States [J].
Hacker, JS .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2004, 98 (02) :243-260
[28]   When is a change big enough to be a system shift? Small system-shifting changes in German and Finnish pension policies [J].
Hinrichs, K ;
Kangas, I .
SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2003, 37 (06) :573-591
[29]  
*HM DEPT HLTH SOC, 1985, REF SOC SEC PROGR AC
[30]  
Hoffe Otfried., 1994, I KANT