Top1- and Top2-mediated topological transitions at replication forks ensure fork progression and stability and prevent DNA damage checkpoint activation

被引:125
作者
Bermejo, Rodrigo
Doksani, Ylli
Capra, Thelma
Katou, Yuki-Mori
Tanaka, Hirokazu
Shirahige, Katsuhiko
Foiani, Marco
机构
[1] Univ Milan, FIRC, Inst Mol Oncol Fdn, I-20139 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, DSBB, I-20139 Milan, Italy
[3] Tokyo Inst Technol, Ctr Biol Resources & Informat, Div Gene Res, Lab Genome Struct & Funct, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2268501, Japan
关键词
replication forks; DNA damage checkpoint; chromosome replication; DNA topoisomerases;
D O I
10.1101/gad.432107
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
DNA topoisomerases solve topological problems during chromosome metabolism. We investigated where and when Top1 and Top2 are recruited on replicating chromosomes and how their inactivation affects fork integrity and DNA damage checkpoint activation. We show that, in the context of replicating chromatin, Top1 and Top2 act within a 600-base-pair (bp) region spanning the moving forks. Top2 exhibits additional S-phase clusters at specific intergenic loci, mostly containing promoters. TOP1 ablation does not affect fork progression and stability and does not cause activation of the Rad53 checkpoint kinase. top2 mutants accumulate sister chromatid junctions in S phase without affecting fork progression and activate Rad53 at the M-G1 transition. top1 top2 double mutants exhibit fork block and processing and phosphorylation of Rad53 and gamma H2A in S phase. The exonuclease Exo1 influences fork processing and DNA damage checkpoint activation in top1 top2 mutants. Our data are consistent with a coordinated action of Top1 and Top2 in counteracting the accumulation of torsional stress and sister chromatid entanglement at replication forks, thus preventing the diffusion of topological changes along large chromosomal regions. A failure in resolving fork-related topological constrains during S phase may therefore result in abnormal chromosome transitions, DNA damage checkpoint activation, and chromosome breakage during segregation.
引用
收藏
页码:1921 / 1936
页数:16
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Functional interactions of DNA topoisomerases with a human replication origin
    Abdurashidova, Gulnara
    Radulescu, Sorina
    Sandoval, Oscar
    Zahariev, Sotir
    Danailov, Miltcho B.
    Demidovich, Alexander
    Santamaria, Laura
    Biamonti, Giuseppe
    Riva, Silvano
    Falaschi, Arturo
    [J]. EMBO JOURNAL, 2007, 26 (04) : 998 - 1009
  • [2] The connection between transcription and genomic instability
    Aguilera, A
    [J]. EMBO JOURNAL, 2002, 21 (03) : 195 - 201
  • [3] Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53
    Alcasabas, AA
    Osborn, AJ
    Bachant, J
    Hu, FH
    Werler, PJH
    Bousset, K
    Furuya, K
    Diffley, JFX
    Carr, AM
    Elledge, SJ
    [J]. NATURE CELL BIOLOGY, 2001, 3 (11) : 958 - 965
  • [4] A mitotic topoisomerase II checkpoint in budding yeast is required for genome stability but acts independently of Pds1/securin
    Andrews, CA
    Vas, AC
    Meier, B
    Giménez-Abián, JF
    Díaz-Martínez, LA
    Green, J
    Erickson, SL
    VanderWaal, KE
    Hsu, WS
    Clarke, DJ
    [J]. GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 20 (09) : 1162 - 1174
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1980, MECH STUDIES DNA REP
  • [6] DNA replication-dependent formation of joint DNA molecules in Physarum polycephalum
    Bénard, M
    Maric, C
    Pierron, G
    [J]. MOLECULAR CELL, 2001, 7 (05) : 971 - 980
  • [7] The DNA damage response during DNA replication
    Branzei, D
    Foiani, M
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CELL BIOLOGY, 2005, 17 (06) : 568 - 575
  • [8] A REPLICATION FORK BARRIER AT THE 3' END OF YEAST RIBOSOMAL-RNA GENES
    BREWER, BJ
    FANGMAN, WL
    [J]. CELL, 1988, 55 (04) : 637 - 643
  • [9] NEED FOR DNA TOPOISOMERASE ACTIVITY AS A SWIVEL FOR DNA-REPLICATION FOR TRANSCRIPTION OF RIBOSOMAL-RNA
    BRILL, SJ
    DINARDO, S
    VOELKELMEIMAN, K
    STERNGLANZ, R
    [J]. NATURE, 1987, 326 (6111) : 414 - 416
  • [10] Does looping and clustering in the nucleus regulate gene expression?
    Chambeyron, S
    Bickmore, WA
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CELL BIOLOGY, 2004, 16 (03) : 256 - 262