STATE OF SCIENCE IN INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY: A REVIEW OF SELF-REPORTED LIMITATIONS

被引：31

作者：

Brutus, Stephane ^{[1
]}

Gill, Harjinder ^{[2
]}

Duniewicz, Kris ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Concordia Univ, John Molson Sch Business, 1455 deMaisonneuve W, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada

[2] Univ Guelph, Dept Psychol, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada

[3] Florida Int Univ, Dept Psychol, Miami, FL 33199 USA

来源：

PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY | 2010年 / 63卷 / 04期

关键词：

METHOD VARIANCE; RESEARCH METHODOLOGY; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; RESEARCH ARTICLES; MANAGEMENT; PERCEPTIONS; PERFORMANCE; VALIDITY; QUALITY; CONTEXT;

D O I：

10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01192.x

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

This study investigated self-reported limitations of published papers as an alternative and novel operationalization of the state of science of industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology. A content analysis was conducted of the reported limitations in every I-O psychology articles published in the Academy of Management Journal, the Journal of Applied Psychology, and Personnel Psychology between 1995 and 2008 (N = 2,402). Articles were coded for the number and types of limitations reported, characteristics of the research design, and topic area. Threats to internal validity were the most often reported limitations. In addition, variations were detected in the reporting of limitations over time, indicating a subtle but steady shift in the focus of I-O psychology research. Implications of these results for the science and practice of I-O psychology and for the use of self-reported limitations in scientific communication are discussed.

引用

页码：907 / 936

页数：30

共 89 条

[71] Procedures: Do we really want to know them? An examination of the effects of procedural justice on self-esteem [J].

Schroth, HA ;

Shah, PP .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 85 (03) :462-471

[72]

Schwab D., 1980, RES ORGAN BEHAV

[73]

Shadish W.R., 2002, Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference, DOI DOI 10.1198/JASA.2005.S22

[74]

Spector P.E., 2001, HDB IND WORK ORG PSY, V1, P10

[75] Method variance in organizational research - Truth or urban legend? [J].

Spector, PE .

ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2006, 9 (02) :221-232

[76]

SPITZNAGEL EL, 1985, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V42, P725

[77]

Stone-Romero E., 2002, Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology

[78] Strategies for improving the validity and utility of research in human resource management and allied disciplines [J].

Stone-Romero, Eugene F. .

HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2008, 18 (04) :205-209

[79]

TADDIO A, 1994, CAN MED ASSOC J, V150, P1611

[80] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN METHODOLOGICAL RIGOR AND REPORTED OUTCOMES IN ORGANIZATION-DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION RESEARCH [J].

TERPSTRA, DE .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 66 (05) :541-543

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 →