Can Signal Enhancement Ratio (SER) Reduce the Number of Recommended Biopsies without Affecting Cancer Yield in Occult MRI-detected Lesions?

被引:27
作者
Arasu, Vignesh A. [1 ]
Chen, Ryan C-Y [1 ]
Newitt, David N.
Chang, C. Belinda [1 ]
Tso, Hilda [1 ]
Hylton, Nola M. [1 ]
Joe, Bonnie N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
关键词
COMPUTER-AIDED EVALUATION; BREAST-CANCER; MALIGNANT LESIONS; DIAGNOSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; KINETICS; FEATURES; WOMEN; NEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2011.02.008
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: We retrospectively determined if signal enhancement ratio (SER), a quantitative measure of contrast kinetics using volumetric parameters, could reduce the number of biopsy recommendations without decreasing the number of cancers detected when applied to suspicious lesions seen on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) 4 or 5 lesions seen on breast MRI in 2008 that were clinically and mammographically occult yielded a final sample size of 73 lesions in 65 patients. Images were processed with in-house software. Parameters used to predict benignity/malignancy included SEA total tumor volume (lesion volume above a 70% initial enhancement level), SEA partial tumor volume (volume with "washout" and "plateau" kinetics), SER washout tumor volume, peak SER, and peak percent enhancement. Thresholds were determined to retrospectively discriminate benign from malignant histopathology. Clinical impact was assessed through the reduction in the number of biopsies recommended (by eliminating benign lesions discriminated by SER). Results: Based on the original radiologist interpretations, 73 occult lesions were called suspicious and biopsied with a predictive value of biopsies (PPV(3)) of 18/73 (25%). SEA parameters were found to be significantly associated with histopathology (P < .05). Biopsy recommendations could be reduced using SER parameters of SEA partial tumor volume (73 to 40), SEA total tumor volume (73 to 45), and peak percent enhancement (73 to 55) without removing true positives. Conclusion: The adjunctive use of SER parameters may reduce the number of recommended biopsies without reducing the number of cancers detected. (C)AUR, 2011
引用
收藏
页码:716 / 721
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
*ACRIN, 6657 ACRIN
[2]   Application of Computer-aided Diagnosis (CAD) in MR-Mammography (MRM): Do We Really Need Whole Lesion Time Curve Distribution Analysis? [J].
Baltzer, Pascal Andreas Thomas ;
Renz, Diane M. ;
Kullnig, Petra E. ;
Gajda, Mieczyslaw ;
Camara, Oumar ;
Kaiser, Werner A. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2009, 16 (04) :435-442
[3]   National trends and practices in breast MRI [J].
Bassett, Lawrence W. ;
Dhaliwal, Sonia G. ;
Eradat, Jilbert ;
Khan, Omer ;
Farria, Dionne F. ;
Brenner, R. James ;
Sayre, James W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 191 (02) :332-339
[4]  
D'Orsi C.J., 2003, Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) breast imaging atlas
[5]   Metabolic and vascular features of dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging and 15O-water positron emission tomography blood flow in breast cancer [J].
Eby, Peter R. ;
Partridge, Savannah C. ;
White, Steven W. ;
Doot, Robert K. ;
Dunnwald, Lisa K. ;
Schubert, Erin K. ;
Kurland, Brenda F. ;
Lehman, Constance D. ;
Mankoff, David A. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2008, 15 (10) :1246-1254
[6]  
Esserman Laura, 1999, Breast J, V5, P13, DOI 10.1046/j.1524-4741.1999.005001013.x
[7]   Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography [J].
Hauth, EAM ;
Stockamp, C ;
Maderwald, S ;
Mühler, A ;
Kimmig, R ;
Jaeger, H ;
Barkhausen, J ;
Forsting, M .
CLINICAL IMAGING, 2006, 30 (03) :160-165
[8]   Review of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Breast Cancer Should MRI Be Performed on All Women with Newly Diagnosed, Early Stage Breast Cancer? [J].
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Hayes, Daniel F. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2009, 59 (05) :290-302
[9]  
Hylton N M, 1999, Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, V7, P411
[10]   Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as an imaging biomarker [J].
Hylton, Nola .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (20) :3293-3298