The effect of long-range interactions on the secondary structure formation of proteins

被引:77
作者
Kihara, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Marky Ctr Struct Biol, Dept Biol Sci Comp Sci, Bindley Biosci Ctr, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
secondary structure prediction; long-range interaction; residue contact order; beta-strand formation;
D O I
10.1110/ps.051479505
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The influence of long-range residue interactions on defining secondary structure in a protein has long been discussed and is often cited as the current limitation to accurate secondary structure prediction. There are several experimental examples where a local sequence alone is not sufficient to determine its secondary structure, but a comprehensive survey on a large data set has not yet been done. Interestingly, some earlier studies denied the negative effect of long-range interactions on secondary structure prediction accuracy. Here, we have introduced the residue contact order (RCO), which directly indicates the separation of contacting residues in terms of the position in the sequence, and examined the relationship between the RCO and the prediction accuracy. A large data set of 2777 nonhomologous proteins was used in our analysis. Unlike previous studies, we do find that prediction accuracy drops as residues have contacts with more distant residues. Moreover, this negative correlation between the RCO and the prediction accuracy was found not only for beta-strands, but also for alpha-helices. The prediction accuracy of beta-strands is lower if residues have a high RCO or a low RCO, which corresponds to the situation that a beta-sheet is formed by beta-strands from different chains in a protein complex. The reason why the current study draws the opposite conclusion from the previous studies is examined. The implication for protein folding is also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1955 / 1963
页数:9
相关论文
共 61 条
[11]  
Fiser A, 1997, COMPUT APPL BIOSCI, V13, P297
[12]   Incorporation of non-local interactions in protein secondary structure prediction from the amino acid sequence [J].
Frishman, D ;
Argos, P .
PROTEIN ENGINEERING, 1996, 9 (02) :133-142
[13]   Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment [J].
Frishman, D ;
Argos, P .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 1995, 23 (04) :566-579
[14]   ANALYSIS OF ACCURACY AND IMPLICATIONS OF SIMPLE METHODS FOR PREDICTING SECONDARY STRUCTURE OF GLOBULAR PROTEINS [J].
GARNIER, J ;
OSGUTHORPE, DJ ;
ROBSON, B .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1978, 120 (01) :97-120
[15]   A novel method for protein secondary structure prediction using dual-layer SVM and profiles [J].
Guo, J ;
Chen, H ;
Sun, ZR ;
Lin, YL .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 54 (04) :738-743
[16]   A novel method of protein secondary structure prediction with high segment overlap measure: Support vector machine approach [J].
Hua, SJ ;
Sun, ZR .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2001, 308 (02) :397-407
[17]   Free-energy landscape of a chameleon sequence in explicit water and its inherent α/β bifacial property [J].
Ikeda, K ;
Higo, J .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2003, 12 (11) :2542-2548
[18]  
Ito M, 1997, COMPUT APPL BIOSCI, V13, P415
[19]   Contact order revisited: Influence of protein size on the folding rate [J].
Ivankov, DN ;
Garbuzynskiy, SO ;
Alm, E ;
Plaxco, KW ;
Baker, D ;
Finkelstein, AV .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2003, 12 (09) :2057-2062
[20]  
Jacoboni I, 2000, PROTEINS, V41, P535, DOI 10.1002/1097-0134(20001201)41:4<535::AID-PROT100>3.0.CO