Segmentation of skull and scalp in 3-D human MRI using mathematical morphology

被引:112
作者
Dogdas, B
Shattuck, DW
Leahy, RM
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Signal & Image Proc Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Lab Neuro Imaging, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
skull segmentation; scalp segmentation; mathematical morphology; MRI;
D O I
10.1002/hbm.20159
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
We present a new technique for segmentation of skull and scalp in T-1-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the human head. Our method uses mathematical morphological operations to generate realistic models of the skull, scalp, and brain that are suitable for electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) source modeling. We first segment the brain using our Brain Surface Extractor algorithm; using this, we can ensure that the brain does not intersect our skull segmentation. We next generate a scalp mask using a combination of thresholding and mathematical morphology. We use the scalp mask in our skull segmentation procedure, as it allows us to automatically exclude background voxels with intensities similar to those of the skull. We find the inner and outer skull boundaries using thresholding and morphological operations. Finally, we mask the results with the scalp and brain volumes to ensure closed and nonintersecting skull boundaries. Visual evaluation indicated accurate segmentations of the cranium at a gross anatomical level (other than small holes in the zygomatic bone in eight subjects) in all 44 MRI volumes processed when run using default settings. In a quantitative comparison with coregistered CT images as a gold standard, MRI skull segmentation accuracy, as measured using the Dice coefficient, was found to be similar to that which would be obtained using CT imagery with a registration error of 2-3 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 285
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
[11]   The influence of brain tissue anisotropy on human EEG and MEG [J].
Haueisen, J ;
Tuch, DS ;
Ramon, C ;
Schimpf, PH ;
Wedeen, VJ ;
George, JS ;
Belliveau, JW .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 15 (01) :159-166
[12]   Segmentation of T1 MR scans for reconstruction of resistive head models [J].
Heinonen, T ;
Eskola, H ;
Dastidar, P ;
Laarne, P ;
Malmivuo, J .
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 1997, 54 (03) :173-181
[13]   Semi-automatic tool for segmentation and volumetric analysis of medical images [J].
Heinonen, T ;
Dastidar, P ;
Kauppinen, P ;
Malmivuo, J ;
Eskola, H .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 1998, 36 (03) :291-296
[14]   Markov random field segmentation of brain MR images [J].
Held, K ;
Kops, ER ;
Krause, BJ ;
Wells, WM ;
Kikinis, R ;
Muller-Gartner, HW .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1997, 16 (06) :878-886
[15]  
KRUGGEL F, 1996, P COMP AID RAD 1996, P323
[16]   Co-registration of EEG and MRI data using matching of spline interpolated and MRI-segmented reconstructions of the scalp surface [J].
Lamm, C ;
Windischberger, C ;
Leodolter, U ;
Moser, E ;
Bauer, H .
BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2001, 14 (02) :93-100
[17]  
Lorensen WE, 1987, COMPUT GRAPH, DOI 10.1145/37401.37422
[18]  
MAZZIOTTA JC, 2000, J ROYAL SOC, V356, P1293
[19]   EEG and MEG: Forward solutions for inverse methods [J].
Mosher, JC ;
Leahy, RM ;
Lewis, PS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 46 (03) :245-259
[20]   3-DIMENSIONAL MAGNETIZATION-PREPARED RAPID GRADIENT-ECHO IMAGING (3DMP-RAGE) [J].
MUGLER, JP ;
BROOKEMAN, JR .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1990, 15 (01) :152-157