FDG-PET improves accuracy in distinguishing frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease

被引:359
作者
Foster, Norman L.
Heidebrink, Judith L.
Clark, Christopher M.
Jagust, William J.
Arnold, Steven E.
Barbas, Nancy R.
DeCarli, Charles S.
Turner, R. Scott
Koeppe, Robert A.
Higdon, Roger
Minoshima, Satoshi
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Ctr Alzheimers Care Imaging Res, Dept Neurol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Neurol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Ann Arbor Vet Adm Hosp, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Penn, Alzheimers Dis Ctr, Inst Aging, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Psychiat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Neurosci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[7] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Neurol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[8] BIATECH Inst, Washington, DC USA
[9] Univ Washington, Dept Radiol, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Alzheimer's disease; PET; FDG; frontotemporal dementia;
D O I
10.1093/brain/awm177
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Distinguishing Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) currently relies on a clinical history and examination, but positron emission tomography with [F-18] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) shows different patterns of hypometabolism in these disorders that might aid differential diagnosis. Six dementia experts with variable FDG-PET experience made independent, forced choice, diagnostic decisions in 45 patients with pathologically confirmed AD (n = 31) or FTD (n = 14) using five separate methods: (1) review of clinical summaries, (2) a diagnostic checklist alone, (3) summary and checklist, (4) transaxial FDG-PET scans and (5) FDG-PET stereotactic surface projection (SSP) metabolic and statistical maps. In addition, we evaluated the effect of the sequential review of a clinical summary followed by SSP. Visual interpretation of SSP images was superior to clinical assessment and had the best inter-rater reliability (mean kappa = 0.78) and diagnostic accuracy (89.6%). It also had the highest specificity (97.6%) and sensitivity (86%), and positive likelihood ratio for FTD (36.5). The addition of FDG-PET to clinical summaries increased diagnostic accuracy and confidence for both AD and FTD. It was particularly helpful when raters were uncertain in their clinical diagnosis. Visual interpretation of FDG-PET after brief training is more reliable and accurate in distinguishing FTD from AD than clinical methods alone. FDG-PET adds important information that appropriately increases diagnostic confidence, even among experienced dementia specialists.
引用
收藏
页码:2616 / 2635
页数:20
相关论文
共 61 条
[51]   Neuroimaging and early diagnosis of Alzheimer disease: A look to the future [J].
Petrella, JR ;
Coleman, RE ;
Doraiswamy, PM .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 226 (02) :315-336
[52]   Mutations in progranulin explain atypical phenotypes with variants in MAPT [J].
Pickering-Brown, Stuart M. ;
Baker, Matt ;
Gass, Jenny ;
Boeve, Bradley F. ;
Loy, Clement T. ;
Brooks, William S. ;
Mackenzie, Ian R. A. ;
Martins, Ralph N. ;
Kwok, John B. J. ;
Halliday, Glenda M. ;
Kril, Jillian ;
Schofield, Peter R. ;
Mann, David M. A. ;
Hutton, Mike .
BRAIN, 2006, 129 :3124-3126
[53]   Neurochemical features of frontotemporal dementia [J].
Procter, AW ;
Qurne, M ;
Francis, PT .
DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 1999, 10 :80-84
[54]   The prevalence of frontotemporal dementia [J].
Ratnavalli, E ;
Brayne, C ;
Dawson, K ;
Hodges, JR .
NEUROLOGY, 2002, 58 (11) :1615-1621
[55]   Utility of clinical criteria in differentiating frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) from AD [J].
Rosen, HJ ;
Hartikainen, KM ;
Jagust, W ;
Kramer, JH ;
Reed, BR ;
Cummings, JL ;
Boone, K ;
Ellis, W ;
Miller, C ;
Miller, BL .
NEUROLOGY, 2002, 58 (11) :1608-1615
[56]  
ROSSO S, 2003, FRONTOTEMPORAL DEMEN
[57]   Functional brain imaging applications to differential diagnosis in the dementias [J].
Salmon, E .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 2002, 15 (04) :439-444
[58]   Positron emission tomography in evaluation of dementia - Regional brain metabolism and long-term outcome [J].
Silverman, DHS ;
Small, GW ;
Chang, CY ;
Lu, CS ;
de Aburto, MAK ;
Chen, W ;
Czernin, J ;
Rapoport, SI ;
Pietrini, P ;
Alexander, GE ;
Schapiro, MB ;
Jagust, WJ ;
Hoffman, JM ;
Welsh-Bohmer, KA ;
Alavi, A ;
Clark, CM ;
Salmon, E ;
de Leon, MJ ;
Mielke, R ;
Cummings, JL ;
Kowell, AP ;
Gambhir, SS ;
Hoh, CK ;
Phelps, ME .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 286 (17) :2120-2127
[59]   Clinical, genetic, and neuropathologic characteristics of posterior cortical atrophy [J].
Tang-Wai, DF ;
Graff-Radford, NR ;
Boeve, BF ;
Dickson, DW ;
Parisi, JE ;
Crook, R ;
Caselli, RJ ;
Knopman, DS ;
Petersen, RC .
NEUROLOGY, 2004, 63 (07) :1168-1174
[60]   Overview of protein aggregation in single, double, and triple neurodegenerative brain amyloidoses [J].
Trojanowski, JQ ;
Mattson, MP .
NEUROMOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2003, 4 (1-2) :1-5