Mediating team effectiveness in the context of collaborative learning: The importance of team and task awareness

被引:167
作者
Fransen, Jos [1 ]
Kirschner, Paul A. [2 ]
Erkens, Gijsbert [3 ]
机构
[1] INHolland Univ Appl Sci, Ctr ELearning, NL-3001 KC Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Open Univ Netherlands, Ctr Learning Sci & Technol CELSTEC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Res Ctr Learning Interact, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Collaborative learning; Higher education; Awareness; Team effectiveness; Learning team; SHARED MENTAL MODELS; SITUATION AWARENESS; COLLECTIVE-EFFICACY; FUNCTIONAL ROLES; GROUP EFFICIENCY; SELF-EFFICACY; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; COMMUNICATION; TRUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.017
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Learning teams in higher education executing a collaborative assignment are not always effective. To remedy this, there is a need to determine and understand the variables that influence team effectiveness. This study aimed at developing a conceptual framework, based on research in various contexts on team effectiveness and specifically team and task awareness. Core aspects of the framework were tested to establish its value for future experiments on influencing team effectiveness. Results confirmed the importance of shared mental models, and to some extent mutual performance monitoring for learning teams to become effective, but also of interpersonal trust as being conditional for building adequate shared mental models. Apart from the importance of team and task awareness for team effectiveness it showed that learning teams in higher education tend to be pragmatic by focusing primarily on task aspects of performance and not team aspects. Further steps have to be taken to validate this conceptual framework on team effectiveness. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1103 / 1113
页数:11
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   The impact of learning styles on student grouping for collaborative learning:: a case study [J].
Alfonseca, Enrique ;
Carro, Rosa M. ;
Martin, Estefania ;
Ortigosa, Alvaro ;
Paredes, Pedro .
USER MODELING AND USER-ADAPTED INTERACTION, 2006, 16 (3-4) :377-401
[2]   Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing teams [J].
Alper, S ;
Tjosvold, D ;
Law, KS .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1998, 74 (01) :33-52
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Learn. Instr., DOI [10.1016/0959-4752, DOI 10.1016/0959-4752, DOI 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher's guide
[5]  
Arbuckle J L., 2006, Amos Computer Program (Version 7.0)
[6]   Further understanding of trust and performance in virtual teams [J].
Aubert, BA ;
Kelsey, BL .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2003, 34 (05) :575-618
[7]   The social fabric of a team-based MBA Program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance [J].
Baldwin, TT ;
Bedell, MD ;
Johnson, JL .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1997, 40 (06) :1369-1397
[8]   When smart groups fail [J].
Barron, B .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2003, 12 (03) :307-359
[9]   Common ground, complex problems and decision making [J].
Beers, Pieter J. ;
Boshuizen, Henny P. A. ;
Kirschner, Paul A. ;
Gijselaers, Wim H. .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2006, 15 (06) :529-556
[10]  
Bereiter C., 2002, Education and mind in the knowledge age