A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of nefazodone in the treatment of patients hospitalized for major depression

被引:39
作者
Feighner, J
Targum, SD
Bennett, ME
Roberts, DL
Kensler, TT
D'Amico, MF
Hardy, SA
机构
[1] Feighner Res Inst, San Diego, CA 92121 USA
[2] Crozer Chester Med Ctr, Upland, PA USA
[3] Bristol Myers Squibb Co, Wallingford, CT 06492 USA
关键词
D O I
10.4088/JCP.v59n0508
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background: There are few published placebo-controlled clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy of the newer antidepressants in markedly or severely depressed hospitalized patients. This study demonstrates the efficacy of nefazodone compared with placebo in the treatment of patients hospitalized for major depression. Method: Nefazodone and placebo treatment were compared in a 6-week trial of 120 patients hospitalized for DSM-III-R diagnosed major depression (without psychosis) at 2 study centers. Efficacy was evaluated using standard psychiatric rating scales, and patients were monitored for safety. Results: Nefazodone treatment resulted in a significant reduction (p < .01) of the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) total score compared with placebo from the end of the first treatment week through the end of the study (-12.2 nefazodone vs, -7.7 placebo). At the end of the trial, significantly mon nefazodone-treated patients (50%) than placebo-treated patients (29%) had responded, as indicated by their Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement score (p = .021) or by a greater than or equal to 50% reduction in their HAM-D-17 scores (p = .017). Significantly more patients treated with nefazodone (36%) than placebo-treated patients (14%) had a HAM-D-17 score less than or equal to 10 at the end of treatment (p = .004). Significant treat ment differences (p < .01) in favor of nefazodone were also seen in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale; the HAM-D retardation, anxiety, and sleep disturbance factors; and HAM-D item 1 (depressed mood). Patients with dysthymia in addition to major depression also showed significant improvement (p < .05) when treated with nefazodone, with significant differences in response rates seen as early as week 2 and through the end of the trial. The mean nefazodone dose was 491 mg/day at the end of week 2 and 503 mg/day at the end of treatment. Nefazodone was well tolerated, and the number of patients discontinuing owing to adverse events was small, with no significant safety issues noted in either treatment group. Fewer nefazodone-treated than placebo-treated patients discontinued owing to lack of efficacy. Conclusion: Nefazodone was superior to placebo in the treatment of marked to severe major depression in patients requiring hospitalization. The clinical benefit of nefazodone was evident as early as the first week of treatment as judged by several measures of efficacy, with significant differences from placebo sustained throughout the trial.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 253
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Andersen B, 1990, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V18, P289
[2]  
Baldwin DS, 1996, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V57, P46
[3]  
Beasley C M Jr, 1993, Ann Clin Psychiatry, V5, P199, DOI 10.3109/10401239309148983
[4]   A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF VENLAFAXINE AND FLUOXETINE IN PATIENTS HOSPITALIZED FOR MAJOR DEPRESSION AND MELANCHOLIA [J].
CLERC, GE ;
RUIMY, P ;
VERDEAUPAILLES, J .
INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 9 (03) :139-143
[5]  
Cohn CK, 1996, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V57, P15
[6]  
CORYELL W, 1990, AM J PSYCHIAT, V147, P1627
[7]   A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY OF FLUOXETINE AND MAPROTILINE IN THE TREATMENT OF MAJOR DEPRESSION [J].
DEJONGHE, F ;
RAVELLI, DP ;
TUYNMANQUA, H .
PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, 1991, 24 (02) :62-67
[8]  
Edwards J. G., 1989, HUM PSYCHOPHARM CLIN, V4, P235
[9]   PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF PAROXETINE IN DEPRESSIVE-ILLNESS [J].
EDWARDS, JG ;
GOLDIE, A .
HUMAN PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1993, 8 (03) :203-209
[10]  
EDWARDS JG, 1989, HUMAN PSYCHOPHARMACO, V5, P374