Evaluation of staging lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer

被引:24
作者
El-Galley, RES
Keane, TE
Petros, JA
Sanders, WH
Clarke, HS
Cotsonis, GA
Graham, SD
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Emory Clin, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00222-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To prospectively evaluate a clinical algorithm that predicts nodal status in patients with prostate cancer and to assess the impact on the outcome. Methods. Between September 1988 and December 1994, 192 patients with organ-confined prostate cancer and considered surgical candidates for radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) were stratified using the algorithm: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 20 ng/mL or less, Gleason score 7 or fewer, and clinical Stage T2a or lower. Patients failing any of these criteria were placed in the high-risk group and underwent a pelvic lymphadenectomy. Patients who satisfied all the criteria were placed in the low-risk group and underwent RPP without evaluation of the pelvic lymph nodes. Another contemporaneous cohort of patients (n = 65) underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy [RRP] without use of the algorithm and were used as a control group. Patients were monitored for at least 24 months. Results. In the RPP group, 177 patients were considered low risk according to the algorithm and were not offered staging lymphadenectomy before surgery, whereas 15 patients were categorized as high risk for metastasis and underwent staging lymphadenectomy. In the RRP and lymphadenectomy group, 41 patients were considered at low risk and 24 at high risk of disease spread according to the algorithm. In the RPP group, low-risk patients (no lymphadenectomy) had a PSA recurrence rate (27%) similar to that of low-risk patients in the RRP group with negative lymph nodes (29%), P = 0.8. Similarly, high-risk patients with negative lymph nodes in both groups had a similar recurrence rate (53% for RPP and 50% for RRP). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that PSA was the most significant predictor for disease recurrence (P = 0.0004) followed by preoperative Gleason scores (P = 0.02) and clinical stages (P = 0.03). Multivariate stepwise analysis demonstrated that Gleason score and clinical stage did not add to the prediction of recurrence over PSA alone. Conclusions. Staging lymphadenectomy can be omitted in low-risk patients without: deleterious effects on the outcome as measured by PSA recurrence. UROLOGY 52: 663-667, 1998. (C) 1998, Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 667
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY CAN BE OMITTED IN SELECTED PATIENTS WITH CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE - DEVELOPMENT OF A SYSTEM OF PATIENT SELECTION [J].
BISHOFF, JT ;
REYES, A ;
THOMPSON, IM ;
HARRIS, MJ ;
STCLAIR, SR ;
GOMELLA, L ;
BUTZIN, CA .
UROLOGY, 1995, 45 (02) :270-274
[2]   ELIMINATING THE NEED FOR BILATERAL PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY IN SELECT PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
BLUESTEIN, DL ;
BOSTWICK, DG ;
BERGSTRALH, EJ ;
OESTERLING, JE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (05) :1315-1320
[3]   EVALUATION OF THE CURRENT INCIDENCE OF NODAL METASTASIS FROM PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
BUNDRICK, WS ;
CULKIN, DJ ;
MATA, JA ;
ZITMAN, RI ;
VENABLE, DD .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 52 (04) :269-271
[4]   OPEN PELVIC LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION FOR PROSTATE-CANCER - A REASSESSMENT [J].
CAMPBELL, SC ;
KLEIN, EA ;
LEVIN, HS ;
PIEDMONTE, MR .
UROLOGY, 1995, 46 (03) :352-355
[5]   REEVALUATION OF THE NEED FOR PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY IN LOW-GRADE PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
FOURNIER, GR ;
NARAYAN, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 72 (04) :484-488
[6]   ARE PELVIC COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY, BONE-SCAN AND PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY NECESSARY IN THE STAGING OF PROSTATIC-CANCER [J].
LEVRAN, Z ;
GONZALEZ, JA ;
DIOKNO, AC ;
JAFRI, SZH ;
STEINERT, BW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 75 (06) :778-781
[7]   THE USE OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, CLINICAL STAGE AND GLEASON SCORE TO PREDICT PATHOLOGICAL STAGE IN MEN WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
PARTIN, AW ;
WALSH, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (01) :172-173
[8]   Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer - A multi-institutional update [J].
Partin, AW ;
Kattan, MW ;
Subong, ENP ;
Walsh, PC ;
Wojno, KJ ;
Oesterling, JE ;
Scardino, PT ;
Pearson, JD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (18) :1445-1451
[9]   LOWER INCIDENCE OF UNSUSPECTED LYMPH-NODE METASTASES IN 521 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS WITH CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
PETROS, JA ;
CATALONA, WJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (06) :1574-1575
[10]   Predicting the patient at low risk for lymph node metastasis with localized prostate cancer: An analysis of four statistical models [J].
Spevack, L ;
Killion, LT ;
West, JC ;
Rooker, GM ;
Brewer, EA ;
Cuddy, PG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 34 (03) :543-547