PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES: REFLEXION AND REFLECTION IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT

被引:427
作者
Hodgkinson, Gerard P. [1 ]
Healey, Mark P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester Business Sch, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
dynamic capabilities; intuition; emotions in strategic decision making; organizational adaptation; strategic change; strategic cognition; behavioral strategy; SOCIAL-COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE; DECISION-MAKING; ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTITY; SELF-REGULATION; RADICAL CHANGE; FRAMING BIAS; COMMITMENT; FIRM; RISK; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1002/smj.964
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In recent years, there has been a move to identify the behavioral foundations underpinning the evolutionary and economic fitness of the enterprise. Indeed, the dynamic capabilities project now occupies center stage in the field of strategic management. Yet the accounts developed thus far-like much of the field's theory and research more generally-are predicated upon a cold cognition logic that downplays the significance of emotional/affective and nonconscious cognitive processes for strategic adaptation. In this article, we rectify this imbalance by drawing upon contemporary advances in social cognitive neuroscience and neuroeconomics to develop a series of countervailing insights and new prescriptions for the development of dynamic capabilities. Using Teece's (2007) influential framework to organize and illustrate our arguments, we demonstrate how the fundamental capabilities of sensing, seizing, and transforming each require firms to harness the cognitive and emotional capacities of individuals and groups to blend effortful forms of analysis with the skilled utilization of less deliberative, intuitive processes. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1500 / 1516
页数:17
相关论文
共 154 条
[81]   Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations [J].
Ito, TA ;
Larsen, JT ;
Smith, NK ;
Cacioppo, JT .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 75 (04) :887-900
[82]   DISCERNING THREATS AND OPPORTUNITIES [J].
JACKSON, SE ;
DUTTON, JE .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1988, 33 (03) :370-387
[83]  
Janis I., 1977, Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment
[84]   A behavioral approach to law and economics [J].
Jolls, C ;
Sunstein, CR ;
Thaler, R .
STANFORD LAW REVIEW, 1998, 50 (05) :1471-1550
[85]   Economic preferences or attitude expressions? An analysis of dollar responses to public issues [J].
Kahneman, D ;
Ritov, I ;
Schkade, D .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1999, 19 (1-3) :203-235
[86]   TIMID CHOICES AND BOLD FORECASTS - A COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE ON RISK-TAKING [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
LOVALLO, D .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1993, 39 (01) :17-31
[87]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[88]  
Kahneman D., 2002, HEURISTICS BIASES PS, P49
[89]  
Kahneman D., 2010, McKinsey Quarterly, V2010, P58
[90]   Conditions for Intuitive Expertise A Failure to Disagree [J].
Kahneman, Daniel ;
Klein, Gary .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2009, 64 (06) :515-526