Ultra-high dose (86.4 Gy) IMRT for localized prostate cancer: Toxicity and biochemical outcomes

被引:215
作者
Cahlon, Oren [1 ]
Zelefsky, Michael J. [1 ]
Shippy, Alison [1 ]
Chan, Heather [1 ]
Fuks, Zvi [1 ]
Yamada, Yoshiya [1 ]
Hunt, Margie [2 ]
Greenstein, Steven [1 ]
Amols, Howard [2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2008年 / 71卷 / 02期
关键词
prostate cancer; toxicity; outcomes; IMRT; dose escalation;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Purpose: To report toxicity and preliminary biochemical outcomes with high-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to a dose of 86.4 Gy for localized prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: Between August 1997 and March 2004,478 patients were treated with 86.4 Gy using a 5- to 7-field IMRT technique. To adhere to normal tissue constraints, the mean D95 and V100 for the planning target volume were 83 Gy and 87%, respectively. Toxicity data were scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0. Freedom from biochemical relapse was calculated. The median follow-up was 53 months. Results: Thirty-seven patients (8%) experienced acute Grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. There was no acute Grade 3 or 4 GI toxicity. One hundred and five patients (22%) experienced acute Grade 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity and three patients (0.6%) had Grade 3 GU toxicity. There was no acute Grade 4 GU toxicity. Sixteen patients (3 %) developed late Grade 2 GI toxicity and two patients (<1 %) developed late Grade 3 GI toxicity. Sixty patients (13%) had late Grade 2 GU toxicity and 12 (<3%) experienced late Grade 3 GU toxicity. The 5-year actuarial PSA relapse-free survival according to the nadir plus 2 ng/mL definition was 98%, 85% and 70% for the low, intermediate, and high risk NCCN prognostic groups. Conclusion: This report represents the largest data set of patients treated to ultra-high radiation dose levels of 86.4 Gy using IMRT for localized prostate cancer. Our findings indicate that this treatment is well tolerated and the early excellent biochemical control rates are encouraging. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 337
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1997, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, V37, P1035
[2]
Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial [J].
Bolla, M ;
Collette, L ;
Blank, L ;
Warde, P ;
Dubois, JB ;
Mirimanoff, RO ;
Storme, G ;
Bernier, J ;
Kuten, A ;
Sternberg, C ;
Mattelaer, J ;
Torecilla, JL ;
Pfeffer, JR ;
Cutajar, CL ;
Zurlo, A ;
Pierart, M .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9327) :103-108
[3]
Planning, delivery, and quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using dynamic multileaf collimator: A strategy for large-scale implementation for the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate [J].
Burman, C ;
Chui, CS ;
Kutcher, G ;
Leibel, S ;
Zelefsky, M ;
LoSasso, T ;
Spirou, S ;
Wu, QW ;
Yang, J ;
Stein, J ;
Mohan, R ;
Fuks, Z ;
Ling, CC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (04) :863-873
[4]
Late morbidity profiles in prostate cancer patients treated to 79-84 Gy by a simple four-field coplanar beam arrangement [J].
Chism, DB ;
Horwitz, EM ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Pinover, WH ;
Mitra, RK ;
Hanks, GE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 55 (01) :71-77
[5]
Chui C S, 2001, Med Dosim, V26, P189, DOI 10.1016/S0958-3947(01)00069-3
[6]
6-month androgen suppression plus radiation therapy vs radiation therapy alone for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer - A randomized controlled trial [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Manola, J ;
Loffredo, M ;
Renshaw, AA ;
DellaCroce, A ;
Kantoff, PW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (07) :821-827
[7]
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: Late morbidity and results on biochemical control [J].
De Meerleer, Gert O. ;
Fonteyne, Valerie H. ;
Vakaet, Luc ;
Villeirs, Geert M. ;
Denoyette, Ludwig ;
Verbaeys, Antony ;
Lummen, Nicolas ;
De Neve, Wilfried J. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 82 (02) :160-166
[8]
Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial [J].
Dearnaley, David P. ;
Sydes, Matthew R. ;
Graham, John D. ;
Aird, Edwin G. ;
Bottomley, David ;
Cowan, Richard A. ;
Huddart, Robert A. ;
Jose, Chakiath C. ;
Matthews, John H. L. ;
Millar, Jeremy ;
Moore, A. Rollo ;
Morgan, Rachel C. ;
Russell, J. Martin ;
Scrase, Christopher D. ;
Stephens, Richard J. ;
Syndikus, Isabel ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. B. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (06) :475-487
[9]
What dose of external-beam radiation is high enough for prostate cancer? [J].
Eade, Thomas N. ;
Hanlon, Alexandra L. ;
Horwitz, Eric M. ;
Buyyounouski, Mark K. ;
Hanks, Gerald E. ;
Pollack, Alan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 68 (03) :682-689
[10]
Dose response in prostate cancer with 8-12 years' follow-up [J].
Hanks, GE ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Epstein, B ;
Horwitz, EM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 54 (02) :427-435