Intensity modulated proton therapy and its sensitivity to treatment uncertainties 1: the potential effects of calculational uncertainties

被引:299
作者
Lomax, A. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Paul Scherrer Inst, Ctr Proton Radiotherapy, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/53/4/014
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The effects of calculational uncertainties on 3D and distal edge tracking ( DET) intensity modulated proton therapy ( IMPT) treatment plans have been investigated. Dose calculation uncertainties have been assessed by comparing analytical and Monte Carlo dose calculations, and potential range uncertainties by recalculating plans with all CT values modified by +/- 3%. Analysis of the volume of PTV agreeing to within +/- 3% between the two calculations shows that the 3D approach provides significantly improved agreement ( 87.1 versus 80.3% of points for the 3D and DET approaches, respectively). For the DET approach, doses in the CTV have also been found to globally change by 5% as a result of 3% changes in CT value. When varying the intra- field gradients of the plans a similar trend is seen, but with the more complex plans also being found to be more sensitive to both uncertainties. In conclusion, the DET approach has been found to be relatively sensitive to the calculational errors investigated here. In contrast, the 3D approach appears to be quite robust, unless strong internal gradients are present. Nevertheless, the routine use of uncertainty analysis is advised when assessing all forms of IMPT plans.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1042
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
[11]   The dosimetric consequences of inter-fractional patient movement on three classes of intensity-modulated delivery techniques in breast radiotherapy [J].
Hector, CL ;
Evans, PM ;
Webb, S .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 59 (03) :281-291
[12]   Adaptation of GEANT4 to Monte Carlo dose calculations based on CT data [J].
Jiang, H ;
Paganetti, H .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (10) :2811-2818
[13]   An adaptive control algorithm for optimization of intensity modulated radiotherapy considering uncertainties in beam profiles, patient set-up and internal organ motion [J].
Lof, J ;
Lind, BK ;
Brahme, A .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (06) :1605-1628
[14]   Intensity modulation methods for proton radiotherapy [J].
Lomax, A .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (01) :185-205
[15]  
Lomax AJ, 2003, RADIOTHER ONCOL, V68, pS52
[16]   Treatment planning and verification of proton therapy using spot scanning:: Initial experiences [J].
Lomax, AJ ;
Böhringer, T ;
Bolsi, A ;
Coray, D ;
Emert, F ;
Goitein, G ;
Jermann, M ;
Lin, SX ;
Pedroni, E ;
Rutz, H ;
Stadelmann, O ;
Timmermann, B ;
Verwey, J ;
Weber, DC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (11) :3150-3157
[17]   Intensity modulated proton therapy: A clinical example [J].
Lomax, AJ ;
Boehringer, T ;
Coray, A ;
Egger, E ;
Goitein, G ;
Grossmann, M ;
Juelke, P ;
Lin, S ;
Pedroni, E ;
Rohrer, B ;
Roser, W ;
Rossi, B ;
Siegenthaler, B ;
Stadelmann, O ;
Stauble, H ;
Vetter, C ;
Wisser, L .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (03) :317-324
[18]  
Lomax Antony J, 2004, Z Med Phys, V14, P147
[19]   Methodologies and tools for proton beam design for lung tumors [J].
Moyers, MF ;
Miller, DW ;
Bush, DA ;
Slater, JD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (05) :1429-1438
[20]  
Nill Simeon, 2004, Z Med Phys, V14, P35