Haemodynamic and electroencephalographic response to insertion of a cuffed oropharyngeal airway: comparison with the laryngeal mask airway

被引:10
作者
Versichelen, L [1 ]
Struys, M [1 ]
Crombez, E [1 ]
Fonck, K [1 ]
Mortier, E [1 ]
Rolly, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
monitoring; bispectral index; equipment; tubes tracheal; cardiovascular system; effects; intubation tracheal; masks anaesthesia;
D O I
10.1093/bja/81.3.393
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We have compared the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA), a modified Guedel airway device with a specially designed cuff at its distal end, with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA), on haemodynamic and electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to insertion. In addition, we examined the haemodynamic and EEG changes during initiation of the effect-compartment controlled infusion. We studied 35 female patients undergoing ambulatory gynaecological surgery allocated randomly to received an LMA or COPA to manage the airway. After premedication with midazolam 0.03 mg kg(-1) i.v. and low-dose alfentanil (0.01 mg kg(-1)), anaesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol, using an effect-compartment controlled infusion set at an effect-site concentration of 4 mu g ml(-1). After intercompartmental equilibration, the LMA (group I) or COPA (group II) was inserted and haemodynamic (arterial pressure, heart rate) and EEG (bispectral index (BIS)) responses to insertion studied. The effect-compartment controlled infusion of propofol caused only mild haemodynamic changes during induction. Changes in arterial pressure and heart rate after insertion were similar in both groups and not significantly different from baseline values before insertion. Changes in BIS after insertion were minor and similar between groups.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 397
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]  
Gepts E, 1988, Anaesthesia, V43 Suppl, P8, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09060.x
[12]  
Glass Peter S. A., 1996, P25
[13]   COMPARISON OF THE HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSE TO LARYNGEAL MASK INSERTION AND OROTRACHEAL INTUBATION [J].
HOLLANDE, J ;
RIOU, B ;
GUERRERO, M ;
LANDAULT, C ;
VIARS, P .
ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 1993, 12 (04) :372-375
[14]   The cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) as an adjunct to fiberoptic endotracheal intubation. [J].
Kay, NH ;
Greenberg, RS .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (03) :A484-A484
[15]   Bispectral analysis of the electroencephalogram predicts conscious processing of information during propofol sedation and hypnosis [J].
Kearse, LA ;
Rosow, C ;
Zaslavsky, A ;
Connors, P ;
Dershwitz, M ;
Denman, W .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 88 (01) :25-34
[16]  
LEACH AB, 1991, EUROPEAN J ANAEST S4, V8, P19
[17]   Prediction of movement during Propofol Nitrous oxide anesthesia - Performance of concentration, electroencephalographic, pupillary, and hemodynamic indicators [J].
Leslie, K ;
Sessler, DI ;
Smith, WD ;
Larson, MD ;
Ozaki, M ;
Blanchard, D ;
Crankshaw, DP .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 84 (01) :52-63
[18]  
PENNANT JH, 1993, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V79, P144
[19]   ANESTHETIC POTENCY (MAC) IS INDEPENDENT OF FOREBRAIN STRUCTURES IN THE RAT [J].
RAMPIL, IJ ;
MASON, P ;
SINGH, H .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 78 (04) :707-712
[20]   Why pharmacokinetic model drug delivery? [J].
Reves, JG ;
Jacobs, JR ;
Sladen, R .
INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS, 1995, 33 (03) :29-43