Antifungal treatment for invasive Candida infections: a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis

被引:30
作者
Mills, Edward J. [1 ,2 ]
Perri, Dan [3 ]
Cooper, Curtis [4 ]
Nachega, Jean B. [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Wu, Ping [2 ]
Tleyjeh, Imad [9 ,10 ]
Phillips, Peter [11 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Burnaby, BC, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hosp, Div Infect Dis, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Int Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Cape Town, South Africa
[8] Stellenbosch Univ, Ctr Infect Dis, Fac Hlth Sci, Cape Town, South Africa
[9] King Fahd Med City, Div Infect Dis, Dept Med, Res Ctr, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[10] Mayo Clin, Div Infect Dis, Dept Med, Rochester, MN USA
[11] Univ British Columbia, Div Infect Dis, Vancouver, BC, Canada
来源
ANNALS OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND ANTIMICROBIALS | 2009年 / 8卷
关键词
Fluconazole; Itraconazole; Voriconazole; Antifungal Therapy; Caspofungin;
D O I
10.1186/1476-0711-8-23
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Objectives: Invasive fungal infections are a major cause of mortality among patients at risk. Treatment guidelines vary on optimal treatment strategies. We aimed to determine the effects of different antifungal therapies on global response rates, mortality and safety. Methods: We searched independently and in duplicate 10 electronic databases from inception to May 2009. We selected any randomized trial assessing established antifungal therapies for confirmed cases of invasive candidiasis among predominantly adult populations. We performed a meta-analysis and then conducted a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison to differentiate treatment effectiveness. Sensitivity analyses included dosage forms of amphotericin B and fluconazole compared to other azoles. Results: Our analysis included 11 studies enrolling a total of 965 patients. For our primary analysis of global response rates, we pooled 7 trials comparing azoles to amphotericin B, Relative Risk [RR] 0.87 (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.78-0.96, P = 0.007, I-2 = 43%, P = 0.09. We also pooled 2 trials of echinocandins versus amphotericin B and found a pooled RR of 1.10 (95% CI, 0.99-1.23, P = 0.08). One study compared anidulafungin to fluconazole and yielded a RR of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.06-1.51) in favor of anidulafungin. We pooled 7 trials assessing azoles versus amphotericin B for all-cause mortality, resulting in a pooled RR of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.74-1.05, P = 0.17, I-2 = 0%, P = 0.96). Echinocandins versus amphotericin B (2 trials) for all-cause mortality resulted in a pooled RR of 1.01 (95% CI, 0.84-1.20, P = 0.93). Anidulafungin versus fluconazole resulted in a RR of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.48-1.10, P = 0.34). Our mixed treatment comparison analysis found similar within-class effects across all interventions. Adverse event profiles differed, with amphotericin B exhibiting larger adverse event effects. Conclusion: Treatment options appear to offer preferential effects on response rates and mortality. When mycologic data are available, therapy should be tailored.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]   Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (11) :1539-1558
[12]   Problems in the design and reporting of trials of antifungal agents encountered during meta-analysis [J].
Johansen, HK ;
Gotzsche, PC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (18) :1752-1759
[13]  
Johansen HK, 2000, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD000969
[14]   COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF THE EFFICACY OF FLUCONAZOLE VERSUS AMPHOTERICIN B/FLUCYTOSINE IN SURGICAL PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC MYCOSES [J].
KUJATH, P ;
LERCH, K ;
KOCHENDORFER, P ;
BOOS, C .
INFECTION, 1993, 21 (06) :376-382
[15]   Voriconazole versus a regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole for candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial [J].
Kullberg, BJ ;
Sobel, JD ;
Ruhnke, M ;
Pappas, PG ;
Viscoli, C ;
Rex, JH ;
Cleary, JD ;
Rubinstein, E ;
Church, LWP ;
Brown, JM ;
Schlamm, HT ;
Oborska, IT ;
Hilton, F ;
Hodges, MR .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9495) :1435-1442
[16]   Micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for candidaemia and invasive candidosis: a phase III randomised double-blind trial [J].
Kuse, Ernst-Ruediger ;
Chetchotisakd, Ploenchan ;
da Cunha, Clovis Arns ;
Ruhnke, Markus ;
Barrios, Carlos ;
Raghunadharao, Digumarti ;
Sekhon, Jagdev Singh ;
Freire, Antonio ;
Ramasubramanian, Venkatasubramanian ;
Demeyer, Ignace ;
Nucci, Marcio ;
Leelarasamee, Amorn ;
Jacobs, Frederique ;
Decruyenaere, Johan ;
Pittet, Didier ;
Ullmann, Andrew J. ;
Ostrosky-Zeichner, Luis ;
Lortholary, Olivier ;
Koblinger, Sonja ;
Diekmann-Berndt, Heike ;
Cornely, Oliver A. .
LANCET, 2007, 369 (9572) :1519-1527
[17]   Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons [J].
Lu, G ;
Ades, AE .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2004, 23 (20) :3105-3124
[18]   Agreement between alternative classifications of acute respiratory distress syndrome [J].
Meade, MO ;
Guyatt, GH ;
Cook, RJ ;
Groll, R ;
Kachura, JR ;
Wigg, M ;
Cook, DJ ;
Slutsky, AS ;
Stewart, TE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 163 (02) :490-493
[19]  
MEUNIER F, 1989, AM J MED, V86, P668
[20]   Comparison of caspofungin and amphotericin B for invasive candidiasis. [J].
Mora-Duarte, J ;
Betts, R ;
Rotstein, C ;
Colombo, AL ;
Thompson-Moya, L ;
Smietana, J ;
Lupinacci, R ;
Sable, C ;
Kartsonis, N ;
Perfect, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (25) :2020-2029