Helical CT of the body: Are settings adjusted for pediatric patients?

被引:324
作者
Paterson, A
Frush, DP
Donnelly, LF
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, McGovern Davison Childrens HlthCtr, Dept Radiol,Div Pediat Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Royal Belfast Hosp Sick Children, Dept Radiol, Belfast BT12 6BE, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] Childrens Hosp, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760297
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to determine whether adjustments related to patient age are made in the scanning parameters that are determinants of radiation dose for helical CT of pediatric patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. This prospective investigation included all body (chest and abdomen) helical CT examinations (n = 58) of neonates, infants, and children (n = 32) referred from outside institutions for whom radiologic consultation was requested. Information recorded included tube current, kilovoltage, collimation, and pitch. Examinations were arbitrarily grouped on the basis of the individual's age: group A, 0-4 years: group B, 5-8 years, group C, 9-12 years, and group D, 13-16 years old. RESULTS. Thirty-one percent (18/58) of the CT examinations were of the chest and 69% (40/58) were of the abdomen. Sixteen percent (9/58) of the CT examinations were combined chest and abdomen. In 22% (2/9) of these combined examinations, tube current was adjusted between the chest and abdomen CT; in one (11%)of these examinations, the tube current was higher for the chest than for the abdomen portion of the CT examination. The mean tube current setting for chest was 213 mA and was 206 mA for the abdomen, with no evident adjustment in tube current based on the age of the patient. Fifty-six percent of the examinations of neonates, infants, or children 8 years old or younger were performed at a collimation of greater than 5 mm and 53% of these examinations were performed using a pitch of 1.0. CONCLUSION. Pediatric helical CT parameters are not adjusted on the basis of the examination type or the age of the child. In particular, these results suggest that pediatric patients may be exposed to an unnecessarily high radiation dose during body CT.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 301
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] FEASIBILITY OF HIGH-RESOLUTION, LOW-DOSE CHEST CT IN EVALUATING THE PEDIATRIC CHEST
    AMBROSINO, MM
    GENIESER, NB
    ROCHE, KJ
    KAUL, A
    LAWRENCE, RM
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 1994, 24 (01) : 6 - 10
  • [2] Multidetector-array CT: Once again, technology creates new opportunities
    Berland, LL
    Smith, JK
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209 (02) : 327 - 329
  • [3] BERLAND LL, 1995, RADIOLOGY, V195, P1
  • [4] Pulmonary nodules: Experimental and clinical studies at low-dose CT
    Diederich, S
    Lenzen, H
    Windmann, R
    Puskas, Z
    Yelbuz, TM
    Henneken, S
    Klaiber, T
    Eameri, M
    Roos, N
    Peters, PE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (01) : 289 - 298
  • [5] FAULKNER K, 1987, ACTA RADIOL, V28, P483
  • [6] Helical CT in children: Technical considerations and body applications
    Frush, DP
    Donnelly, LF
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209 (01) : 37 - 48
  • [7] FRUSH DP, 1999, RAD SOC N AM SPEC CO, P17
  • [8] Comparison of 1.0-, 1.5-, and 2.0-pitch abdominal helical computed tomography in evaluation of normal structures and pathologic lesions
    Hopper, KD
    Kasales, CJ
    Mahraj, RPM
    Starr, MB
    Tenhave, TR
    Jozefiak, JA
    Patrone, SV
    Singer, PS
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1997, 32 (11) : 660 - 666
  • [9] The breast: In-plane x-ray protection during diagnostic thoracic CT - Shielding with bismuth radioprotective garments
    Hopper, KD
    King, SH
    Lobell, ME
    TenHave, TR
    Weaver, JS
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 (03) : 853 - 858
  • [10] Utility of low mA 1.5 pitch helical versus conventional high mA abdominal CT
    Hopper, KD
    Keeton, NC
    Kasales, CJ
    Mahraj, R
    van Slyke, MA
    Patrone, SV
    Singer, PS
    Tenhave, TR
    [J]. CLINICAL IMAGING, 1998, 22 (01) : 54 - 59