Helical CT of the body: Are settings adjusted for pediatric patients?

被引:324
作者
Paterson, A
Frush, DP
Donnelly, LF
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, McGovern Davison Childrens HlthCtr, Dept Radiol,Div Pediat Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Royal Belfast Hosp Sick Children, Dept Radiol, Belfast BT12 6BE, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] Childrens Hosp, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760297
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to determine whether adjustments related to patient age are made in the scanning parameters that are determinants of radiation dose for helical CT of pediatric patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. This prospective investigation included all body (chest and abdomen) helical CT examinations (n = 58) of neonates, infants, and children (n = 32) referred from outside institutions for whom radiologic consultation was requested. Information recorded included tube current, kilovoltage, collimation, and pitch. Examinations were arbitrarily grouped on the basis of the individual's age: group A, 0-4 years: group B, 5-8 years, group C, 9-12 years, and group D, 13-16 years old. RESULTS. Thirty-one percent (18/58) of the CT examinations were of the chest and 69% (40/58) were of the abdomen. Sixteen percent (9/58) of the CT examinations were combined chest and abdomen. In 22% (2/9) of these combined examinations, tube current was adjusted between the chest and abdomen CT; in one (11%)of these examinations, the tube current was higher for the chest than for the abdomen portion of the CT examination. The mean tube current setting for chest was 213 mA and was 206 mA for the abdomen, with no evident adjustment in tube current based on the age of the patient. Fifty-six percent of the examinations of neonates, infants, or children 8 years old or younger were performed at a collimation of greater than 5 mm and 53% of these examinations were performed using a pitch of 1.0. CONCLUSION. Pediatric helical CT parameters are not adjusted on the basis of the examination type or the age of the child. In particular, these results suggest that pediatric patients may be exposed to an unnecessarily high radiation dose during body CT.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 301
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [21] SIEGEL MJ, 1995, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V33, P997
  • [22] SIEGEL MJ, 1999, PEDIAT BODY CT, P26
  • [23] Imaging of the liver with helical CT: A survey of scanning techniques
    Silverman, PM
    Kohan, L
    Ducic, I
    Javadi, S
    Meyer, C
    Sharma, N
    Cooper, CC
    Zeman, RK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 170 (01) : 149 - 152
  • [24] Extended pitch thoracic helical CT 47
    Singer, PS
    Hopper, KD
    Jozefiak, JA
    Patrone, SV
    Kasales, CJ
    Mahraj, RPM
    Tenhave, TR
    Tully, DA
    [J]. CLINICAL IMAGING, 1998, 22 (01) : 11 - 14
  • [25] Hepatic enhancement analysis in children using Smart Prep monitoring for 2:1 pitch helical scanning
    Vade, A
    Olson, MC
    Vittore, CP
    Subbaiah, P
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 1999, 29 (09) : 689 - 693
  • [26] Evaluation of image quality using 1:1 pitch and 1.5:1 pitch helical CT in children: A comparative study
    Vade, A
    Demos, TC
    Olson, MC
    Subbaiah, P
    Turbin, RC
    Vickery, K
    Corrigan, K
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 1996, 26 (12) : 891 - 893
  • [27] Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations
    Wall, BF
    Hart, D
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1997, 70 (833) : 437 - 439
  • [28] Radiation effective doses to patients undergoing abdominal CT examinations
    Ware, DE
    Huda, W
    Mergo, PJ
    Litwiller, AL
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 210 (03) : 645 - 650
  • [29] Helical/spiral CT scanning: A pediatric radiology perspective
    White, KS
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 1996, 26 (01) : 5 - 14
  • [30] Pulmonary nodules: Effect on detection of spiral CT pitch
    Wright, AR
    Collie, DA
    Williams, JR
    HashemiMalayeri, B
    Stevenson, AJM
    Turnbull, CM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1996, 199 (03) : 837 - 841