Oral contrast agents for small bowel distension in MRI: influence of the osmolarity for small bowel distention

被引:44
作者
Ajaj, W
Goyen, M
Schneemann, H
Kuehle, C
Nuefer, M
Ruehm, SG
Goehde, SC
Lauenstein, TC
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol & Neuroradiol, D-45122 Essen, Germany
[2] Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Essen, Inst Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Essen, Germany
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
negative oral contrast agent; osmolarity; small bowel distension; MR imaging;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-005-2711-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To assess the effect of the osmolarity for small bowel distension in MRI, ten volunteers ingested at two separate occasions negative oral contrast agents with different quantity and osmolarity: (1) a water solution combined with 2.0% sorbitol and 0.2% locus bean gum (LBG) with a quantity of 1500 ml and an osmolarity of 148 mOsmol/l, (2) a water solution combined with 2.0% sorbitol and 2.0% barium sulphate with a quantity of 1000 ml and an osmolarity of 194 mOsmol/l. Small bowel distension was quantified on coronal 2D-TrueFISP images by measuring the small bowel diameters. There were no statistically significant differences in mean small bowel diameter between both contrast agents. The mean small bowel distension was 19.2 mm after ingestion of 1500 ml of sorbitol-LBG solution and 19.0 mm after ingestion of 1000-ml sorbitol-barium sulphate solution. Furthermore, all volunteers found the ingestion of 1000-ml solution more pleasant than the 1500-ml solution. The ingestion of 1000 ml of sorbitol-barium sulphate solution led to a sufficient small bowel distension compared to 1500 ml of sorbitol-LBG solution. The side effect rate of both solutions was low. Based on these data, we recommend a quantity of 1000 ml of sorbitol-barium sulphate solution as an alternative for 1500-ml sorbitol-LBG solution for optimal bowel distension.
引用
收藏
页码:1400 / 1406
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Oral contrast agents for small bowel MRI: comparison of different additives to optimize bowel distension [J].
Ajaj, W ;
Goehde, SC ;
Schneemann, H ;
Ruehm, SG ;
Debatin, JF ;
Lauenstein, TC .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (03) :458-464
[2]   Dual-modality PET/CT scanning with negative oral contrast agent to avoid artifacts: Introduction and evaluation [J].
Antoch, G ;
Kuehl, H ;
Kanja, J ;
Lauenstein, TC ;
Schneemann, H ;
Hauth, E ;
Jentzen, W ;
Beyer, T ;
Goehde, SC ;
Debatin, JF .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (03) :879-885
[3]   Bowel MR imaging with oral Gastrografin: an experimental study with healthy volunteers [J].
Borthne, AS ;
Dormagen, JB ;
Gjesdal, KI ;
Storaas, T ;
Lygren, I ;
Geitung, JT .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (01) :100-106
[4]   MR enteroclysis: technical considerations and clinical applications [J].
Gourtsoyiannis, N ;
Papanikolaou, N ;
Grammatikakis, J ;
Prassopoulos, P .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (11) :2651-2658
[5]   MR enteroclysis protocol optimization: comparison between 3D FLASH with fat saturation after intravenous gadolinium injection and true FISP sequences [J].
Gourtsoyiannis, N ;
Papanikolaou, N ;
Grammatikakis, J ;
Maris, T ;
Prassopoulos, P .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (06) :908-913
[6]  
HANSEL R, PHARMAKOGNOSY PHYTOP
[7]   PHOTON MASS ATTENUATION AND ENERGY-ABSORPTION COEFFICIENTS FROM 1 KEV TO 20 MEV [J].
HUBBELL, JH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 1982, 33 (11) :1269-1290
[8]   The epidemiology and the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease [J].
Karlinger, K ;
Györke, T ;
Makö, E ;
Mester, A ;
Tarján, Z .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (03) :154-167
[9]   CROHNS-DISEASE - PILOT-STUDY COMPARING MRI OF THE ABDOMEN WITH CLINICAL-EVALUATION [J].
KETTRITZ, U ;
ISAACS, K ;
WARSHAUER, DM ;
SEMELKA, RC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1995, 21 (03) :249-253
[10]   Optimization of oral contrast agents for MR imaging of the small bowel [J].
Lauenstein, TC ;
Schneemann, H ;
Vogt, FM ;
Herborn, CU ;
Rühm, SG ;
Debatin, JF .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 228 (01) :279-283